Being Trusted to Act: Early Childhood Teachers’ Understandings of Teacher Agency

Teacher agency is increasingly emphasised in early childhood education and care (ECEC) research and policy, yet limited research has explored how teachers themselves understand agency within the contemporary Australian ECEC landscape. Guided by Priestley et al.’s (2015) ecological model of agency, this study explored ECEC teachers’ understandings of agency through an online national survey (n = 229) and qualitative data (n = 12) from interviews, focus group discussions, and reflective journals. Qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Teachers described agency as relationally afforded and contextually mediated. Ten interrelated constructs ( autonomy, control, independence, ownership, voice, power, choice, intentionality, freedom, and flexibility ) were identified and organised into four interconnected orientations: self-determination, influence, reflexivity, and responsiveness . This study offers an empirically grounded account of agency with implications for leadership, professional learning, and policy in ECEC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391261489279
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Being Trusted to Act: Early Childhood Teachers’ Understandings of Teacher Agency

Laura McFarland, Amelia Church, Jane Page, Shuo Liu
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

Being Trusted to Act: Early Childhood Teachers’ Understandings of Teacher Agency

Laura McFarland, Amelia Church, Jane Page, Shuo Liu
article en

Abstract

Teacher agency is increasingly emphasised in early childhood education and care (ECEC) research and policy, yet limited research has explored how teachers themselves understand agency within the contemporary Australian ECEC landscape. Guided by Priestley et al.’s (2015) ecological model of agency, this study explored ECEC teachers’ understandings of agency through an online national survey (n = 229) and qualitative data (n = 12) from interviews, focus group discussions, and reflective journals. Qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Teachers described agency as relationally afforded and contextually mediated. Ten interrelated constructs ( autonomy, control, independence, ownership, voice, power, choice, intentionality, freedom, and flexibility ) were identified and organised into four interconnected orientations: self-determination, influence, reflexivity, and responsiveness . This study offers an empirically grounded account of agency with implications for leadership, professional learning, and policy in ECEC.

Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
The University of Melbourne (AU), La Trobe University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Being Trusted to Act: Early Childhood Teachers’ Understandings of Teacher Agency — Laura McFarland, Amelia Church, et al. · Australasian Journal of Early Childhood (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS