Evaluating Defined Outcome Buffer Strategies

This article evaluates the performance features of buffer fund strategies packaged in mutual funds and ETFs. These popular strategies are the modern version of put spread collars, which institutional investors have used since the 1990s to reduce equity exposure in a structured manner. Using rules-based indexes representing laddered S&P 500 buffer strategy benchmarks with almost ten years of return history, we assess their performance and risk relative to S&P 500 and 60%/40% Equity/Fixed Income portfolio proxies. Because of the asymmetric return patterns of buffer fund strategies, we argue that their risk measurement should be based on downside volatility metrics. We use the 2022–2024 period of significant drawdown and recovery in equity and bond markets to illustrate the return benefits of buffer fund strategies versus 60/40 equity/fixed income and equity-plus-cash alternatives. This analysis highlights that managing downside risk with buffer strategies has demonstrated benefits relative to traditional asset allocation approaches, particularly amid the uncertainty surrounding equity and fixed-income correlations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2026.066
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluating Defined Outcome Buffer Strategies

Joanne M. Hill, Samuel Moore
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Evaluating Defined Outcome Buffer Strategies

Joanne M. Hill, Samuel Moore
article en

Abstract

This article evaluates the performance features of buffer fund strategies packaged in mutual funds and ETFs. These popular strategies are the modern version of put spread collars, which institutional investors have used since the 1990s to reduce equity exposure in a structured manner. Using rules-based indexes representing laddered S&P 500 buffer strategy benchmarks with almost ten years of return history, we assess their performance and risk relative to S&P 500 and 60%/40% Equity/Fixed Income portfolio proxies. Because of the asymmetric return patterns of buffer fund strategies, we argue that their risk measurement should be based on downside volatility metrics. We use the 2022–2024 period of significant drawdown and recovery in equity and bond markets to illustrate the return benefits of buffer fund strategies versus 60/40 equity/fixed income and equity-plus-cash alternatives. This analysis highlights that managing downside risk with buffer strategies has demonstrated benefits relative to traditional asset allocation approaches, particularly amid the uncertainty surrounding equity and fixed-income correlations.

The Journal of Portfolio Management
ING Direct (US), Advanced Technology Systems Company (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Defined Outcome Buffer Strategies — Joanne M. Hill, Samuel Moore · The Journal of Portfolio Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS