Taxing homeowners in China: Who are the winners and losers?

Abstract This article examines the impacts of implementing a property tax on China's housing markets and its welfare consequences. We first provide reduced‐form evidence showing that the policy adoption in Shanghai had little impact on the overall housing market, with suggestive evidence of a reduction in the unit prices of larger homes. Next, we develop a general equilibrium overlapping generations model of housing and rental markets with heterogeneous agents to study the welfare implications of universal and targeted property taxes. By calibrating our model to China's housing market, we obtain three main results: First, the universal property tax reduces house prices and raises rents. Second, the increased rents and higher ongoing housing expenditure due to a larger tax burden make housing services less affordable. However, low‐income households benefit more from the redistribution of additional government revenue. Finally, we show that universal property taxes result in a long‐run welfare gain driven by redistribution and lower house prices. Along the transition, 55% of existing households experience a welfare loss. The policy reform generates significant redistributive effects where poorer households gain and richer households lose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Real Estate Economics
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.70074
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Taxing homeowners in China: Who are the winners and losers?

Yunho Cho, Sisi Zhang, Jinseong Park
Real Estate Economics
Housing Market and Economics
article

Taxing homeowners in China: Who are the winners and losers?

Yunho Cho, Sisi Zhang, Jinseong Park
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the impacts of implementing a property tax on China's housing markets and its welfare consequences. We first provide reduced‐form evidence showing that the policy adoption in Shanghai had little impact on the overall housing market, with suggestive evidence of a reduction in the unit prices of larger homes. Next, we develop a general equilibrium overlapping generations model of housing and rental markets with heterogeneous agents to study the welfare implications of universal and targeted property taxes. By calibrating our model to China's housing market, we obtain three main results: First, the universal property tax reduces house prices and raises rents. Second, the increased rents and higher ongoing housing expenditure due to a larger tax burden make housing services less affordable. However, low‐income households benefit more from the redistribution of additional government revenue. Finally, we show that universal property taxes result in a long‐run welfare gain driven by redistribution and lower house prices. Along the transition, 55% of existing households experience a welfare loss. The policy reform generates significant redistributive effects where poorer households gain and richer households lose.

Real Estate Economics
Sogang University (KR), Jinan University (CN), Department of Public (IN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Taxing homeowners in China: Who are the winners and losers? — Yunho Cho, Sisi Zhang, et al. · Real Estate Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS