A Mixed-Methods Study of How Older Adults with Advanced CKD Perceive Kidney Failure Risk

INTRODUCTION: Older adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) underestimate their kidney failure risk, which threatens timely dialysis decision-making. Cognitive biases are reversible thinking patterns that distort risk perception. We tested how cognitive biases may impact risk perception in CKD and explored participants' risk communication preferences. METHODS: We conducted a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study in adults over 60 with Stage 3B-5 CKD. We quantified objective (Kidney Failure Risk Equation) vs. perceived kidney failure risk, cognitive biases (present bias, loss aversion, optimism bias), frailty (Physical Frailty Phenotype), cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), Patient Activation (PAM-13), depressive symptoms (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self Report-16), and numeracy (Subjective Numeracy Scale). We tested for associations between these factors and concordance between objective vs. perceived risk. Participants underestimating objective kidney failure risk were interviewed alongside caregivers. RESULTS: Only 24% of participants reported prognostic concordance. Participants with high objective risk who also perceived their risk as 'high' (concordance) reported more loss aversion than those who perceived their risk as 'low' (88% vs. 54%; p< 0.05). In a multivariable model restricted to participants with complete data (N=167), higher Patient Activation was independently associated with lower odds of prognostic uncertainty (Odds Ratio 0.66; 95% Confidence Interval 0.44-0.99). Thirty-eight participants who underestimated their objective risk and 27 caregivers expanded on their cognitive biases, described fatalistic beliefs, and caregiver burnout. Participants described having less prognostic knowledge than caregivers. Participants recommended clinicians use hopeful language, involve caregivers and spiritual leaders in prognostic discussions, acknowledge their numeracy, and apply real-time uremic symptom monitoring to improve risk awareness. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with CKD had discordance between objective and perceived kidney failure risk. Nephrology clinicians can query patients' cognitive biases to examine their impact on risk perception and apply key information delivery methods when communicating kidney failure risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000001220
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Mixed-Methods Study of How Older Adults with Advanced CKD Perceive Kidney Failure Risk

Heather L. Prigmore, Fahad Saeed, Jennifer S. Scherer, Mohana Karlekar et al.
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

A Mixed-Methods Study of How Older Adults with Advanced CKD Perceive Kidney Failure Risk

Heather L. Prigmore, Fahad Saeed, Jennifer S. Scherer, Mohana Karlekar, Jia Hwei Ng, David G. Schlundt, Devika Nair, Robert A. Greevy, Kemberlee Bonnet, Katherine Trapani, Paul G. Jacob
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Older adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) underestimate their kidney failure risk, which threatens timely dialysis decision-making. Cognitive biases are reversible thinking patterns that distort risk perception. We tested how cognitive biases may impact risk perception in CKD and explored participants' risk communication preferences. METHODS: We conducted a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study in adults over 60 with Stage 3B-5 CKD. We quantified objective (Kidney Failure Risk Equation) vs. perceived kidney failure risk, cognitive biases (present bias, loss aversion, optimism bias), frailty (Physical Frailty Phenotype), cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), Patient Activation (PAM-13), depressive symptoms (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self Report-16), and numeracy (Subjective Numeracy Scale). We tested for associations between these factors and concordance between objective vs. perceived risk. Participants underestimating objective kidney failure risk were interviewed alongside caregivers. RESULTS: Only 24% of participants reported prognostic concordance. Participants with high objective risk who also perceived their risk as 'high' (concordance) reported more loss aversion than those who perceived their risk as 'low' (88% vs. 54%; p< 0.05). In a multivariable model restricted to participants with complete data (N=167), higher Patient Activation was independently associated with lower odds of prognostic uncertainty (Odds Ratio 0.66; 95% Confidence Interval 0.44-0.99). Thirty-eight participants who underestimated their objective risk and 27 caregivers expanded on their cognitive biases, described fatalistic beliefs, and caregiver burnout. Participants described having less prognostic knowledge than caregivers. Participants recommended clinicians use hopeful language, involve caregivers and spiritual leaders in prognostic discussions, acknowledge their numeracy, and apply real-time uremic symptom monitoring to improve risk awareness. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with CKD had discordance between objective and perceived kidney failure risk. Nephrology clinicians can query patients' cognitive biases to examine their impact on risk perception and apply key information delivery methods when communicating kidney failure risk.

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vanderbilt University (US), Centennial Medical Center (US), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (US), Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US), University of Rochester (US), New York University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.