Effects of continuous intravenous lidocaine infusion versus adductor canal block on postoperative pain and functional recovery after arthroscopic knee surgery: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Arthroscopic knee surgery is increasingly performed in ambulatory settings, where effective analgesia and rapid recovery are essential. However, the incremental benefit of adductor canal block (ACB) over systemic analgesic strategies remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether continuous intravenous lidocaine is non-inferior to ACB for postoperative analgesia and recovery. In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded non-inferiority trial, 76 patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic meniscal surgery under general anesthesia were assigned to intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg loading, 2 mg/kg/h infusion) or ultrasound-guided ACB (15 mL 0.2% ropivacaine). The primary outcome was the mean 24-hour postoperative resting pain score (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS, 0–10). Secondary outcomes included quadriceps strength, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, paresthesia, rescue analgesia, adverse events, and time to discharge. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. Mean 24-hour pain scores were comparable (0.82 ± 0.75 vs. 0.79 ± 0.78), with a difference of 0.03. The upper bound of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval was 0.4, which was below the predefined non-inferiority margin (Δ = 1.0), confirming non-inferiority. Pain scores and rescue analgesia were similar. Quadriceps strength was higher with lidocaine at 1 h and 24 h ( P < 0.05). QoR-15 was slightly higher with ACB ( P = 0.05) but did not reach clinical significance. Paresthesia was less frequent with lidocaine (3% vs. 26%, P = 0.01). Time to discharge was shorter with lidocaine (4.98 ± 1.80 h vs. 6.34 ± 1.36 h, P = 0.007). Intravenous lidocaine provides non-inferior analgesia to ACB and is associated with better quadriceps function, fewer sensory disturbances, and earlier discharge after ambulatory arthroscopic meniscal surgery. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500095362), registered on January 6, 2025.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07221-4
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effects of continuous intravenous lidocaine infusion versus adductor canal block on postoperative pain and functional recovery after arthroscopic knee surgery: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Kaihua He, Daiyu Chen, Ludan Liang, Wei Dai
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Effects of continuous intravenous lidocaine infusion versus adductor canal block on postoperative pain and functional recovery after arthroscopic knee surgery: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Kaihua He, Daiyu Chen, Ludan Liang, Wei Dai
article en

Abstract

Arthroscopic knee surgery is increasingly performed in ambulatory settings, where effective analgesia and rapid recovery are essential. However, the incremental benefit of adductor canal block (ACB) over systemic analgesic strategies remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether continuous intravenous lidocaine is non-inferior to ACB for postoperative analgesia and recovery. In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded non-inferiority trial, 76 patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic meniscal surgery under general anesthesia were assigned to intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg loading, 2 mg/kg/h infusion) or ultrasound-guided ACB (15 mL 0.2% ropivacaine). The primary outcome was the mean 24-hour postoperative resting pain score (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS, 0–10). Secondary outcomes included quadriceps strength, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, paresthesia, rescue analgesia, adverse events, and time to discharge. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. Mean 24-hour pain scores were comparable (0.82 ± 0.75 vs. 0.79 ± 0.78), with a difference of 0.03. The upper bound of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval was 0.4, which was below the predefined non-inferiority margin (Δ = 1.0), confirming non-inferiority. Pain scores and rescue analgesia were similar. Quadriceps strength was higher with lidocaine at 1 h and 24 h ( P < 0.05). QoR-15 was slightly higher with ACB ( P = 0.05) but did not reach clinical significance. Paresthesia was less frequent with lidocaine (3% vs. 26%, P = 0.01). Time to discharge was shorter with lidocaine (4.98 ± 1.80 h vs. 6.34 ± 1.36 h, P = 0.007). Intravenous lidocaine provides non-inferior analgesia to ACB and is associated with better quadriceps function, fewer sensory disturbances, and earlier discharge after ambulatory arthroscopic meniscal surgery. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500095362), registered on January 6, 2025.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.