Revisiting Roth’s Paradox of Historical Narratives

Abstract This paper presents Paul Roth’s Paradox of Historical Narratives and three options: reject the paradox, accept the paradox, or resolve the paradox. I show how the paradox motivates a view called ‘narrativism’ in the philosophy of history, and that narrativists must either accept or resolve the paradox. I argue that narrativists should resolve the paradox.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analysis
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anag073
Primary Topic
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Revisiting Roth’s Paradox of Historical Narratives

Jack Morgan Jones
Analysis
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
article

Revisiting Roth’s Paradox of Historical Narratives

Jack Morgan Jones
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents Paul Roth’s Paradox of Historical Narratives and three options: reject the paradox, accept the paradox, or resolve the paradox. I show how the paradox motivates a view called ‘narrativism’ in the philosophy of history, and that narrativists must either accept or resolve the paradox. I argue that narrativists should resolve the paradox.

Analysis
University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting Roth’s Paradox of Historical Narratives — Jack Morgan Jones · Analysis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS