Retention in care: is it still a clinically useful indicator for monitoring long-term engagement in HIV care in the treat-all era?

OBJECTIVES: Describe changes in visit frequency by viral suppression (VS) vs. non-VS among people with HIV (PWH) in the US treat-all era. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. METHODS: We defined six period-cohorts of PWH in U.S. clinical cohorts of the NA-ACCORD who had initiated antiretroviral therapy and were retained in clinic (attended ≥1 visit in 9 months [mo]) prior to January 1, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 (n = 42 389-54 655). We estimated the proportions of PWH retained in clinic, having gaps in visits of >9-15mo or >15mo, and returned to clinic after gaps by time-updated VS status (< vs. ≥200 copies/ml) over 2 years of follow-up using multi-state models, standardized to the 2012 cohort. RESULTS: PWH in 2012 cohort had a median age of 51 years (IQR: 43-58); 85% were cismen; 43% were non-Hispanic Black; 15% were Hispanic; 84% had VS at baseline. The proportions of PWH having >9-15mo gaps with prior VS increased from 2012 (3.8%; 95% CI: 3.6%, 3.9%) to 2022 (6.9%; 95% CI: 6.5%, 7.3%). The proportions of PWH having >15mo gaps with prior VS increased from 2012 (6.6%; 95% CI: 6.4%, 6.8%) to 2022 (10.7%; 95% CI: 10.2%, 11.2%). The proportions of PWH with >9-15mo and >15mo gaps with non-VS remained low from 2012 to 2022. The majority of PWH returned to clinic after gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 12 years, PWH with prior VS had more gaps in visits that did not meet a minimum of 6-mo visit frequency consistent with standard retention indicators. Better indicators are needed to optimally direct resources for care engagement and VS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0000000000004623
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Retention in care: is it still a clinically useful indicator for monitoring long-term engagement in HIV care in the treat-all era?

Catherine R. Lesko, Elisa Yazdani, Lauren C. Zalla, Lesley S. Park et al.
AIDS
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Retention in care: is it still a clinically useful indicator for monitoring long-term engagement in HIV care in the treat-all era?

Catherine R. Lesko, Elisa Yazdani, Lauren C. Zalla, Lesley S. Park, Joyce Jones, Jessie K. Edwards, Sita Lujintanon, Brenna Hogan, Kelly A Gebo, Peter F. Rebeiro, Nel Jason L. Haw, Richard D. Moore, Michael A. Horberg, Vincent C. Marconi, Sonia Napravnik, Jonathan A. Colasanti, Amber J. Hackstadt, Jennifer O. Lam, Keri N. Althoff
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Describe changes in visit frequency by viral suppression (VS) vs. non-VS among people with HIV (PWH) in the US treat-all era. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. METHODS: We defined six period-cohorts of PWH in U.S. clinical cohorts of the NA-ACCORD who had initiated antiretroviral therapy and were retained in clinic (attended ≥1 visit in 9 months [mo]) prior to January 1, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 (n = 42 389-54 655). We estimated the proportions of PWH retained in clinic, having gaps in visits of >9-15mo or >15mo, and returned to clinic after gaps by time-updated VS status (< vs. ≥200 copies/ml) over 2 years of follow-up using multi-state models, standardized to the 2012 cohort. RESULTS: PWH in 2012 cohort had a median age of 51 years (IQR: 43-58); 85% were cismen; 43% were non-Hispanic Black; 15% were Hispanic; 84% had VS at baseline. The proportions of PWH having >9-15mo gaps with prior VS increased from 2012 (3.8%; 95% CI: 3.6%, 3.9%) to 2022 (6.9%; 95% CI: 6.5%, 7.3%). The proportions of PWH having >15mo gaps with prior VS increased from 2012 (6.6%; 95% CI: 6.4%, 6.8%) to 2022 (10.7%; 95% CI: 10.2%, 11.2%). The proportions of PWH with >9-15mo and >15mo gaps with non-VS remained low from 2012 to 2022. The majority of PWH returned to clinic after gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 12 years, PWH with prior VS had more gaps in visits that did not meet a minimum of 6-mo visit frequency consistent with standard retention indicators. Better indicators are needed to optimally direct resources for care engagement and VS.

AIDS
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Emory University (US), George Washington University (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Grady Health System (US), Berkeley Public Health Division (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.