A health informatics in-depth evaluation study of the rural, across-distance implementation of a health information system: Implementing in the wild

BACKGROUND: This study involved the across-distance implementation of a Patient Administration System (PAS) in rural Australia, led by three health information managers (HIMs). The setting was a vast, rural health district with 10 widely dispersed health collectives ('agencies'), each encompassing a hospital and up to five additional facilities that delivered acute, rehabilitation, residential aged care, bush nursing and/or community health services to their rural and semi-rural populations. OBJECTIVE: The research aimed to examine, contemporaneously, the across-distance PAS implementation work of a team of HIMs. METHOD: This qualitative research adopted a bounded case study approach utilising the ethnographic methods of unobtrusive observation of the project committees (Steering Committee, Project Managers' Committee, Team Leaders' Committee) and in-depth interviews with the HIM team and other key actors. Temporally, the research primarily centred on the lead-up to Go-Live, via point-in-time snapshots and shadowing of the HIM team's work at different junctures. RESULTS: The HIM team enacted alignment with typical, health system implementation stages. Problems encountered were: Go-Live timings; consultation on design of referral functions; poor or absent report, referral, and billing functionalities; and universal health IT implementation issues of insufficient staffing resources and too-tight timeframes. Constantly problem-solving to (re-)balance tensions between the agencies' desire for an effective PAS and the realities of a government-imposed, standardised system, the HIMs imagined the new PAS and its impacts on the agencies' data collection processes, day-to-day operations, and patient care. From a distance, they intensively and collectively imagined and (re-)ordered technology, systems, policies, procedures, work and documentation practices, patient and information flows, and adjunct services, to establish a PAS with integrity and address the requirements of the purchaser agencies' directors, management, clinicians, HIMs, and finance and administrative staff. CONCLUSION: The HIM team applied knowledge of healthcare systems and processes, mitigated risk, and mediated the technology and the stakeholders' worlds. Their collaborative work to establish PAS-related order was congruent with our previous findings on the work of HIMs, Australia-wide.Implications for health information management practice:This case study research highlights the significance of HIMs' deep professional knowledge of (a) health informatics and information systems, and (b) healthcare agencies' data requirements, practices, and artefacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Information Management Journal
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583261483160
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A health informatics in-depth evaluation study of the rural, across-distance implementation of a health information system: Implementing in the wild

Kerin Robinson, Simon Barraclough
Health Information Management Journal
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

A health informatics in-depth evaluation study of the rural, across-distance implementation of a health information system: Implementing in the wild

Kerin Robinson, Simon Barraclough
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study involved the across-distance implementation of a Patient Administration System (PAS) in rural Australia, led by three health information managers (HIMs). The setting was a vast, rural health district with 10 widely dispersed health collectives ('agencies'), each encompassing a hospital and up to five additional facilities that delivered acute, rehabilitation, residential aged care, bush nursing and/or community health services to their rural and semi-rural populations. OBJECTIVE: The research aimed to examine, contemporaneously, the across-distance PAS implementation work of a team of HIMs. METHOD: This qualitative research adopted a bounded case study approach utilising the ethnographic methods of unobtrusive observation of the project committees (Steering Committee, Project Managers' Committee, Team Leaders' Committee) and in-depth interviews with the HIM team and other key actors. Temporally, the research primarily centred on the lead-up to Go-Live, via point-in-time snapshots and shadowing of the HIM team's work at different junctures. RESULTS: The HIM team enacted alignment with typical, health system implementation stages. Problems encountered were: Go-Live timings; consultation on design of referral functions; poor or absent report, referral, and billing functionalities; and universal health IT implementation issues of insufficient staffing resources and too-tight timeframes. Constantly problem-solving to (re-)balance tensions between the agencies' desire for an effective PAS and the realities of a government-imposed, standardised system, the HIMs imagined the new PAS and its impacts on the agencies' data collection processes, day-to-day operations, and patient care. From a distance, they intensively and collectively imagined and (re-)ordered technology, systems, policies, procedures, work and documentation practices, patient and information flows, and adjunct services, to establish a PAS with integrity and address the requirements of the purchaser agencies' directors, management, clinicians, HIMs, and finance and administrative staff. CONCLUSION: The HIM team applied knowledge of healthcare systems and processes, mitigated risk, and mediated the technology and the stakeholders' worlds. Their collaborative work to establish PAS-related order was congruent with our previous findings on the work of HIMs, Australia-wide.Implications for health information management practice:This case study research highlights the significance of HIMs' deep professional knowledge of (a) health informatics and information systems, and (b) healthcare agencies' data requirements, practices, and artefacts.

Health Information Management Journal
La Trobe University (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.