Medicaid Expansion and Mortality Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Importance: Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) substantially increased insurance coverage among adults with low income, yet its impact on colorectal cancer survival and underlying mechanisms remains incompletely defined. Objective: To evaluate the association between Medicaid expansion and overall survival among adults with colorectal cancer and to assess heterogeneity by race and ethnicity, disease stage, and potential mechanisms, including stage at diagnosis and treatment use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database (2006-2021). Adults aged 40 to 64 years with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer were included. A difference-in-differences design compared outcomes between Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states in pre-ACA (2006-2013) and post-ACA (2014-2021) periods. The data were analyzed between January 18 and March 30, 2026. Exposure: Residence in a Medicaid expansion vs nonexpansion state. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included stage at diagnosis and treatment use. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), relative hazard reductions, and absolute differences were estimated. Results: Among 658 593 adults (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [6.3] years; 366 800 male [55.7%]), Medicaid expansion was associated with lower overall mortality (difference-in-differences HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.95]), corresponding to a 6.3% (95% CI, 5.1%-7.5%) relative reduction in overall mortality. The largest survival association was observed among Hispanic patients (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75-0.80]). Benefits were also seen across all disease stages, with the most pronounced association observed in stage IV disease (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.94]). Expansion was associated with an increase of 2.13 percentage points in early-stage diagnosis (95% CI, 1.60-2.65 percentage points) and increased surgical treatment (1.54 percentage points [95% CI, 1.19-1.90 percentage points]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of adults with colorectal cancer found that Medicaid expansion was associated with improved survival. Observed shifts in stage at diagnosis and treatment use were consistent with but could not establish, given the available data, earlier detection and improved access to definitive care as mechanisms. Persistent heterogeneity across populations highlights the need for additional strategies to ensure equitable cancer outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.34827
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Medicaid Expansion and Mortality Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Surya Nalamati, Kakra Hughes, Oladayo Oyebanji, Babawale Oluborode et al.
JAMA Network Open
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Medicaid Expansion and Mortality Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Surya Nalamati, Kakra Hughes, Oladayo Oyebanji, Babawale Oluborode, Marwan Abouljoud, Christine Nembhard, Quyen Chu, Oluwasegun Akinyemi, Bolarinwa Akinwumi, Craig Reickert, Fadeke Ogunyankin, Terrence Fullum
article en

Abstract

Importance: Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) substantially increased insurance coverage among adults with low income, yet its impact on colorectal cancer survival and underlying mechanisms remains incompletely defined. Objective: To evaluate the association between Medicaid expansion and overall survival among adults with colorectal cancer and to assess heterogeneity by race and ethnicity, disease stage, and potential mechanisms, including stage at diagnosis and treatment use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database (2006-2021). Adults aged 40 to 64 years with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer were included. A difference-in-differences design compared outcomes between Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states in pre-ACA (2006-2013) and post-ACA (2014-2021) periods. The data were analyzed between January 18 and March 30, 2026. Exposure: Residence in a Medicaid expansion vs nonexpansion state. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included stage at diagnosis and treatment use. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), relative hazard reductions, and absolute differences were estimated. Results: Among 658 593 adults (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [6.3] years; 366 800 male [55.7%]), Medicaid expansion was associated with lower overall mortality (difference-in-differences HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.95]), corresponding to a 6.3% (95% CI, 5.1%-7.5%) relative reduction in overall mortality. The largest survival association was observed among Hispanic patients (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75-0.80]). Benefits were also seen across all disease stages, with the most pronounced association observed in stage IV disease (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.94]). Expansion was associated with an increase of 2.13 percentage points in early-stage diagnosis (95% CI, 1.60-2.65 percentage points) and increased surgical treatment (1.54 percentage points [95% CI, 1.19-1.90 percentage points]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of adults with colorectal cancer found that Medicaid expansion was associated with improved survival. Observed shifts in stage at diagnosis and treatment use were consistent with but could not establish, given the available data, earlier detection and improved access to definitive care as mechanisms. Persistent heterogeneity across populations highlights the need for additional strategies to ensure equitable cancer outcomes.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(9)
Western Illinois University (US), Howard University (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US), Cook Children's Health Care System (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.