THC Labeling Discrepancies Across Cannabis Flower Product Subtypes in a State-Legal Market

Introduction: High-concentration delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products, with limited research, are becoming accessible in a rapidly expanding cannabis market. There is concern about poor labeling accuracy for THC in recreationally available cannabis, which could impact public health and consumer safety. However, coarse and fine-grained data representative of the scope of legal-market cannabis products have not been reported. This project aimed to investigate THC labeling discrepancies in recreational cannabis flower products and extend examinations to the accuracy of representative cannabis flower subtypes commonly available in a state-legal market. Materials and Methods: Products were purchased between November 2022 and March 2025 from 59 licensed dispensaries across Colorado and analyzed for discrepancies in labeled versus observed THC concentration (%). Cannabis flower products ( N = 265) were included and further divided into pre-pack ( n = 76), pre-roll ( n = 27), re-pack ( n = 55), and deli ( n = 107) subtypes. Based on regulatory guidelines, product accuracy was determined by evaluating whether observed THC concentration (%) was within ± 15% of labeled THC concentration (%), and was further evaluated by product subtype. Results: Half (51.7%) of the flower products sampled were accurately labeled. Labeling accuracy ( χ 2 (6) = 15.15, p = 0.02) and the percent deviation from labeled THC concentration (%) (H = 14.3, p < 0.001) depended on product subtype. Post hoc comparisons for product accuracy indicated that pre-roll products were more likely to be over-labeled (59.3%), and re-pack products had the greatest proportions of mislabeled products that were over-labeled (96.0%). Furthermore, post hoc comparisons indicated that pre-roll products had the greatest deviation from labeled THC concentration (19.6%). Conclusion: Consistent with previous findings, recreational flower products were inaccurately labeled for THC. While all flower product subtypes demonstrated low labeling accuracy, it was observed that products subject to greater handling by dispensaries (i.e., pre-roll and re-pack) were more prone to THC over-labeling inaccuracies. Future research should explore how these findings impact consumer trust, consumption, and purchasing habits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125261489482
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

THC Labeling Discrepancies Across Cannabis Flower Product Subtypes in a State-Legal Market

Jonathon K. Lisano, Duncan I. Mackie, L. Cinnamon Bidwell, Carillon J. Skrzynski et al.
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

THC Labeling Discrepancies Across Cannabis Flower Product Subtypes in a State-Legal Market

Jonathon K. Lisano, Duncan I. Mackie, L. Cinnamon Bidwell, Carillon J. Skrzynski, Marco Ortiz Torres, Tylor M. Savage
article en

Abstract

Introduction: High-concentration delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products, with limited research, are becoming accessible in a rapidly expanding cannabis market. There is concern about poor labeling accuracy for THC in recreationally available cannabis, which could impact public health and consumer safety. However, coarse and fine-grained data representative of the scope of legal-market cannabis products have not been reported. This project aimed to investigate THC labeling discrepancies in recreational cannabis flower products and extend examinations to the accuracy of representative cannabis flower subtypes commonly available in a state-legal market. Materials and Methods: Products were purchased between November 2022 and March 2025 from 59 licensed dispensaries across Colorado and analyzed for discrepancies in labeled versus observed THC concentration (%). Cannabis flower products ( N = 265) were included and further divided into pre-pack ( n = 76), pre-roll ( n = 27), re-pack ( n = 55), and deli ( n = 107) subtypes. Based on regulatory guidelines, product accuracy was determined by evaluating whether observed THC concentration (%) was within ± 15% of labeled THC concentration (%), and was further evaluated by product subtype. Results: Half (51.7%) of the flower products sampled were accurately labeled. Labeling accuracy ( χ 2 (6) = 15.15, p = 0.02) and the percent deviation from labeled THC concentration (%) (H = 14.3, p < 0.001) depended on product subtype. Post hoc comparisons for product accuracy indicated that pre-roll products were more likely to be over-labeled (59.3%), and re-pack products had the greatest proportions of mislabeled products that were over-labeled (96.0%). Furthermore, post hoc comparisons indicated that pre-roll products had the greatest deviation from labeled THC concentration (19.6%). Conclusion: Consistent with previous findings, recreational flower products were inaccurately labeled for THC. While all flower product subtypes demonstrated low labeling accuracy, it was observed that products subject to greater handling by dispensaries (i.e., pre-roll and re-pack) were more prone to THC over-labeling inaccuracies. Future research should explore how these findings impact consumer trust, consumption, and purchasing habits.

Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Technology Holding (United States) (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Montana (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.