Development and evaluation of a patient-centred decision aid to support shared decision-making for selecting targeted therapies in rheumatic diseases: a development and usability study

The growing availability of targeted therapies has made shared decision-making essential to align treatment options with patient values and preferences. We aimed to develop a patient-centred decision aid (DA) to support patients with rheumatic diseases and healthcare providers in selecting appropriate therapies. Following the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), we used a systematic approach to develop the DA. Scope and design were defined collaboratively with rheumatologists, specialist nurses, researchers, and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The prototype presented rheumatic disease information, treatment options, and their risks and benefits. Usability was evaluated in 20 patients (10 RA; 10 AS) using structured questionnaires and the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Participants rated clarity, information sufficiency, layout, and decision confidence on a 5-point Likert scale. The DA delivered clear, accessible information on targeted therapies, using visual aids and plain language to aid understanding. Usability testing indicated high satisfaction. More than 90% of participants found the DA easy to read and useful for discussing treatment options with clinicians. In exploratory analyses, median DCS scores decreased after DA use, in both RA (48.4 to 21.9; P = 0.008) and AS (43.0 to 20.3; P = 0.006) groups. The DA is a user-friendly, evidence-based tool developed and evaluated according to IPDAS. The DA showed high acceptability among patients and healthcare professionals and supported shared decision-making for patients initiating targeted therapies for RA and AS. Exploratory findings also suggested lower decisional conflict scores after DA use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03834-1
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Development and evaluation of a patient-centred decision aid to support shared decision-making for selecting targeted therapies in rheumatic diseases: a development and usability study

Se Rim Choi, Soo-Kyung Cho, Yoon-Kyoung Sung, Ha-Rim Park et al.
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Development and evaluation of a patient-centred decision aid to support shared decision-making for selecting targeted therapies in rheumatic diseases: a development and usability study

Se Rim Choi, Soo-Kyung Cho, Yoon-Kyoung Sung, Ha-Rim Park, Yun Jeong Choi
article en

Abstract

The growing availability of targeted therapies has made shared decision-making essential to align treatment options with patient values and preferences. We aimed to develop a patient-centred decision aid (DA) to support patients with rheumatic diseases and healthcare providers in selecting appropriate therapies. Following the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), we used a systematic approach to develop the DA. Scope and design were defined collaboratively with rheumatologists, specialist nurses, researchers, and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The prototype presented rheumatic disease information, treatment options, and their risks and benefits. Usability was evaluated in 20 patients (10 RA; 10 AS) using structured questionnaires and the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Participants rated clarity, information sufficiency, layout, and decision confidence on a 5-point Likert scale. The DA delivered clear, accessible information on targeted therapies, using visual aids and plain language to aid understanding. Usability testing indicated high satisfaction. More than 90% of participants found the DA easy to read and useful for discussing treatment options with clinicians. In exploratory analyses, median DCS scores decreased after DA use, in both RA (48.4 to 21.9; P = 0.008) and AS (43.0 to 20.3; P = 0.006) groups. The DA is a user-friendly, evidence-based tool developed and evaluated according to IPDAS. The DA showed high acceptability among patients and healthcare professionals and supported shared decision-making for patients initiating targeted therapies for RA and AS. Exploratory findings also suggested lower decisional conflict scores after DA use.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Hanyang University Seoul Hospital (KR), Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Disease (KR), Hanyang University (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.