Taxonomies for connecting technical components of AI-based fraud detection systems and fairness approaches

Abstract Our study investigates the inter-dependencies between the technical components of AI-based fraud detection systems and fairness approaches. Here, fairness approaches refer to any method or process to address, specify, measure or mitigate unfairness in AI systems. Despite extensive research on both AI-based fraud detection systems and AI fairness, these domains are often treated separately, leading to a fragmented understanding of both domains. This fragmentation leads to inconsistent terminologies and concepts, and fails to identify the inter-dependencies between technical components of fraud detection systems and fairness approaches. These are the research gaps we address in this study. Through a literature review of 78 papers, we synthesize existing concepts and terminologies into two structured taxonomies that allow to document these inter-dependencies. One taxonomy describes the technical components of AI fraud detection systems and another describes fairness approaches. A joint evaluation of the taxonomies reveals how technical components are impacting fairness, and how fairness considerations should govern the design and implementation of these technical components. Our findings show that four technical components (regarding class imbalance, overlapping class distributions, data quality, and adaptive learning) are intertwined with fairness approaches in fraud detection. The proposed taxonomies, and the inter-dependencies we identify, support AI practitioners and decision-makers in designing fair fraud detection systems. Additionally, the taxonomies provide structure to research investigating how technical components and technical decisions impact fairness and, vice versa, investigating how fairness approaches impact the technical design of fraud detection systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01375-x
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Taxonomies for connecting technical components of AI-based fraud detection systems and fairness approaches

Emma Beauxis-Aussalet, Sebastiaan Berendsen
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Taxonomies for connecting technical components of AI-based fraud detection systems and fairness approaches

Emma Beauxis-Aussalet, Sebastiaan Berendsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Our study investigates the inter-dependencies between the technical components of AI-based fraud detection systems and fairness approaches. Here, fairness approaches refer to any method or process to address, specify, measure or mitigate unfairness in AI systems. Despite extensive research on both AI-based fraud detection systems and AI fairness, these domains are often treated separately, leading to a fragmented understanding of both domains. This fragmentation leads to inconsistent terminologies and concepts, and fails to identify the inter-dependencies between technical components of fraud detection systems and fairness approaches. These are the research gaps we address in this study. Through a literature review of 78 papers, we synthesize existing concepts and terminologies into two structured taxonomies that allow to document these inter-dependencies. One taxonomy describes the technical components of AI fraud detection systems and another describes fairness approaches. A joint evaluation of the taxonomies reveals how technical components are impacting fairness, and how fairness considerations should govern the design and implementation of these technical components. Our findings show that four technical components (regarding class imbalance, overlapping class distributions, data quality, and adaptive learning) are intertwined with fairness approaches in fraud detection. The proposed taxonomies, and the inter-dependencies we identify, support AI practitioners and decision-makers in designing fair fraud detection systems. Additionally, the taxonomies provide structure to research investigating how technical components and technical decisions impact fairness and, vice versa, investigating how fairness approaches impact the technical design of fraud detection systems.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(5)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Taxonomies for connecting technical components of AI-based fraud detection systems and fairness approaches — Emma Beauxis-Aussalet, Sebastiaan Berendsen · AI and Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS