What makes partnerships work? Measuring agreement in participant beliefs regarding ‘core’ reasons for success

Successful partnerships between people with different backgrounds and distinct beliefs are essential to solve 21st-century problems. We conducted 44 semi-structured interviews and 80 surveys with participants of academic-nonprofit partnerships. We used Plackett-Luce statistics and cultural consensus analysis to analyze respondent beliefs regarding partnership success. Respondents consistently placed a high value on a subset of 'core' reasons that academic-nonprofit partnerships succeed and exhibited higher-than-expected levels of agreement regarding the order of importance of these 'core' reasons. The approach we present here can be used before, during, and after partnerships to improve the design, implementation, and evaluation of team science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356371
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

What makes partnerships work? Measuring agreement in participant beliefs regarding ‘core’ reasons for success

Mason Clay Mathews, Alexandria Drake
PLoS ONE
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

What makes partnerships work? Measuring agreement in participant beliefs regarding ‘core’ reasons for success

Mason Clay Mathews, Alexandria Drake
article en

Abstract

Successful partnerships between people with different backgrounds and distinct beliefs are essential to solve 21st-century problems. We conducted 44 semi-structured interviews and 80 surveys with participants of academic-nonprofit partnerships. We used Plackett-Luce statistics and cultural consensus analysis to analyze respondent beliefs regarding partnership success. Respondents consistently placed a high value on a subset of 'core' reasons that academic-nonprofit partnerships succeed and exhibited higher-than-expected levels of agreement regarding the order of importance of these 'core' reasons. The approach we present here can be used before, during, and after partnerships to improve the design, implementation, and evaluation of team science.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Florida State University (US), University of Puget Sound (US), VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
Virginia G. Piper Charitable Trust
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What makes partnerships work? Measuring agreement in participant beliefs regarding ‘core’ reasons for success — Mason Clay Mathews, Alexandria Drake · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS