Risk-based lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in a Canadian province: Evaluation results of a demonstration project in Quebec, Canada

Background A Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) was launched in Quebec, Canada to inform province-wide lung cancer screening implementation. This study analyses key performance indicators of the screening pathway. Methods High-risk smokers and ex-smokers were referred or self-referred for screening. Eligibility was based on the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCOm2012 noRace ) 6-year risk (≥2%). Lung-RADS 3 and Lung-RADS 4 rates, lung cancer detection and false-positive rates, and early-stage cancer proportion (TNM stages I and II), along with other performance indicators, were computed for the two first screening rounds. Results Between June 2021 and November 2022, 8416 individuals were referred to the project, and 4422 were eligible (53.4%; target ≥50%). The first 3200 participants were included in the study. Mean PLCOm2012 noRace risk was 5.2%. In round 1, Lung-RADS 4 occurred in 6.8% of participants (target ≤10%), with a cancer detection rate of 1.7% (target ≥1.5%), and a false-positive rate of 5.3% (target ≤10%). In round 2, Lung-RADS 4 rate was 4.0% (target ≤5%), with a cancer detection rate of 0.8% (target ≥0.7%), and a false-positive rate of 3.2% (target ≤5%). Early stage cancers accounted for 85.2% in round 1 and 84.2% in round 2 (target ≥70%). Adherence to the next screening among Lung-RADS 1 or 2 participants was ≥81% across both rounds (target ≥70%). Overall, 91.1% of screen-detected cancers received curative treatment (target ≥65%). Conclusion Results showed good performance strengthening evidence on key indicators pertaining to benefits and harms of lung cancer screening within a provincial public health care system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Screening
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413261481721
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Risk-based lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in a Canadian province: Evaluation results of a demonstration project in Quebec, Canada

Nicole Ezer, Isabelle Théberge, José Massougbodji, Simon Martel et al.
Journal of Medical Screening
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Risk-based lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in a Canadian province: Evaluation results of a demonstration project in Quebec, Canada

Nicole Ezer, Isabelle Théberge, José Massougbodji, Simon Martel, Hélène Lizotte, Gino Boily, Nicole Bouchard, Sonia Rodrigue, Marie-Hélène Guertin
article en

Abstract

Background A Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) was launched in Quebec, Canada to inform province-wide lung cancer screening implementation. This study analyses key performance indicators of the screening pathway. Methods High-risk smokers and ex-smokers were referred or self-referred for screening. Eligibility was based on the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCOm2012 noRace ) 6-year risk (≥2%). Lung-RADS 3 and Lung-RADS 4 rates, lung cancer detection and false-positive rates, and early-stage cancer proportion (TNM stages I and II), along with other performance indicators, were computed for the two first screening rounds. Results Between June 2021 and November 2022, 8416 individuals were referred to the project, and 4422 were eligible (53.4%; target ≥50%). The first 3200 participants were included in the study. Mean PLCOm2012 noRace risk was 5.2%. In round 1, Lung-RADS 4 occurred in 6.8% of participants (target ≤10%), with a cancer detection rate of 1.7% (target ≥1.5%), and a false-positive rate of 5.3% (target ≤10%). In round 2, Lung-RADS 4 rate was 4.0% (target ≤5%), with a cancer detection rate of 0.8% (target ≥0.7%), and a false-positive rate of 3.2% (target ≤5%). Early stage cancers accounted for 85.2% in round 1 and 84.2% in round 2 (target ≥70%). Adherence to the next screening among Lung-RADS 1 or 2 participants was ≥81% across both rounds (target ≥70%). Overall, 91.1% of screen-detected cancers received curative treatment (target ≥65%). Conclusion Results showed good performance strengthening evidence on key indicators pertaining to benefits and harms of lung cancer screening within a provincial public health care system.

Journal of Medical Screening
McGill University Health Centre (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CA), Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (CA), Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA), Institut National de Santé Publique (CI), Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux (Québec) (CA), Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services Sociaux (CA)
Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, Partenariat Canadien Contre Le Cancer
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.