Non-Western operational art of coercion: Comparing Russia, Israel, and Iran

This article examines coercion strategies outside the Western intellectual tradition. It introduces the concept of the ‘operational art of coercion’ and scrutinizes how Russia, Israel, and Iran translate political intent into campaigns of deterrence and compellence. The study argues that strategic culture shapes how actors define credibility, manage escalation, integrate domains, and learn. In all three cases, operational art of coercion is iterative, cross-domain, and often diverges from the classical Western model of stable, prewar strategic influence. Even if competitive military learning accelerates worldwide, coercive practices are likely to stay culturally distinct rather converging toward a universal template.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Strategic Studies
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2026.2730132
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Non-Western operational art of coercion: Comparing Russia, Israel, and Iran

Maxim A. Suchkov, Dmitry (Dima) Adamsky
Journal of Strategic Studies
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

Non-Western operational art of coercion: Comparing Russia, Israel, and Iran

Maxim A. Suchkov, Dmitry (Dima) Adamsky
article en

Abstract

This article examines coercion strategies outside the Western intellectual tradition. It introduces the concept of the ‘operational art of coercion’ and scrutinizes how Russia, Israel, and Iran translate political intent into campaigns of deterrence and compellence. The study argues that strategic culture shapes how actors define credibility, manage escalation, integrate domains, and learn. In all three cases, operational art of coercion is iterative, cross-domain, and often diverges from the classical Western model of stable, prewar strategic influence. Even if competitive military learning accelerates worldwide, coercive practices are likely to stay culturally distinct rather converging toward a universal template.

Journal of Strategic Studies
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU), Brandman University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.