Effects of basic and dual-task training programs on physical function in Parkinson’s disease: The PARKEX study

Exercise is a promising non-pharmacological intervention for motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, direct comparisons between basic physical training (BPT) and dual-task training remain limited. The objective of the current clinical trial is to evaluate clinical and functional effects of BPT and a BPT combined with dual-task functional exercises (BPT + FE) in individuals with PD. In this randomized controlled trial, 24 participants with idiopathic PD were allocated to BPT, BPT + FE, or a no-intervention control group (Con). Interventions lasted 12 weeks (three 60-minute sessions/week). Outcomes included quality of life (PDQ-39), depressive symptoms (BDI), lower-limb strength (1-minute Sit-to-Stand Test, STS), and functional mobility (Timed Up and Go, TUG). Group effects were analyzed using permutation-based ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Both interventions significantly improved physical performance vs. controls. STS gains were observed for BPT vs. Con (Mean Difference, MD = 31.00; p = .0026) and BPT + FE vs. Con (MD = 19.00; p = .0026). TUG times improved for BPT vs. Con (MD = -2.07s; p = .0039) and BPT + FE vs. Con (MD = -2.43s; p = .0028). Although BDI and PDQ-39 did not show statistically significant changes between group differences (r_rb = -0.429 and -0.339, respectively), several subscales demonstrated medium effect sizes suggesting potentially meaningful trends: emotional well-being (BPT: r_rb = -0.428; BPT + FE: r_rb = -0.446), bodily discomfort (BPT: r_rb = -0.524), and activities of daily living (BPT + FE: r_rb = -0.429). In conclusion, both programs improved physical performance in PD. Patient-reported outcomes did not reach statistical significance, but effect-size patterns suggest possible psychosocial benefits that warrant confirmation in larger trials. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05963425.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358534
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effects of basic and dual-task training programs on physical function in Parkinson’s disease: The PARKEX study

Maria Giné‐Garriga, Ariadna Laguna, Juan Carlos Magaña, Mercè Avellanet et al.
PLoS ONE
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Effects of basic and dual-task training programs on physical function in Parkinson’s disease: The PARKEX study

Maria Giné‐Garriga, Ariadna Laguna, Juan Carlos Magaña, Mercè Avellanet, Marta Martínez‐Vicente, Elvira Gea, Silvia Enríquez-Calzada, Joel Montané, Roger Prat, Ona Perez-Larumbe, Susana P. Pereira, Cláudia M. Deus, Jorge Hernández-Vara
article en

Abstract

Exercise is a promising non-pharmacological intervention for motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, direct comparisons between basic physical training (BPT) and dual-task training remain limited. The objective of the current clinical trial is to evaluate clinical and functional effects of BPT and a BPT combined with dual-task functional exercises (BPT + FE) in individuals with PD. In this randomized controlled trial, 24 participants with idiopathic PD were allocated to BPT, BPT + FE, or a no-intervention control group (Con). Interventions lasted 12 weeks (three 60-minute sessions/week). Outcomes included quality of life (PDQ-39), depressive symptoms (BDI), lower-limb strength (1-minute Sit-to-Stand Test, STS), and functional mobility (Timed Up and Go, TUG). Group effects were analyzed using permutation-based ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Both interventions significantly improved physical performance vs. controls. STS gains were observed for BPT vs. Con (Mean Difference, MD = 31.00; p = .0026) and BPT + FE vs. Con (MD = 19.00; p = .0026). TUG times improved for BPT vs. Con (MD = -2.07s; p = .0039) and BPT + FE vs. Con (MD = -2.43s; p = .0028). Although BDI and PDQ-39 did not show statistically significant changes between group differences (r_rb = -0.429 and -0.339, respectively), several subscales demonstrated medium effect sizes suggesting potentially meaningful trends: emotional well-being (BPT: r_rb = -0.428; BPT + FE: r_rb = -0.446), bodily discomfort (BPT: r_rb = -0.524), and activities of daily living (BPT + FE: r_rb = -0.429). In conclusion, both programs improved physical performance in PD. Patient-reported outcomes did not reach statistical significance, but effect-size patterns suggest possible psychosocial benefits that warrant confirmation in larger trials. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05963425.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of Andorra (AD), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO), AgriBio (AU), Research Network (United States) (US), Universitat Ramon Llull (ES), University of Coimbra (PT)
Universitat Ramon Llull
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.