The Future is Already Queer: Contemporary Concepts for Queering Literacy Research

In this multiauthrored, polyvocal piece, we, a group of eight literacy researchers reflects on how we engage queer theories and practices to not only make sense of the here-and-now but to foster queer futures in the present. More specifically, we draw on queer theorizations of futurity as grounded in imagination and care to present a series of snapshots in which each scholar individually reflects on a central question, concept, and/or framework animating their current scholarship, followed by a synthesizing conclusion that reflects on queer possibilities for meeting and moving beyond the quagmire of the present. Our intent is to provide a (necessarily incomplete) kaleidoscopic image of current queer literacies research that speaks both to scholars in literacy education and those interested in LGBTQ+ studies in education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377261476999
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Future is Already Queer: Contemporary Concepts for Queering Literacy Research

James Joshua Coleman, Carol Brochin, Craig A. Young, Kate Kedley et al.
Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
Gender Studies in Language
article

The Future is Already Queer: Contemporary Concepts for Queering Literacy Research

James Joshua Coleman, Carol Brochin, Craig A. Young, Kate Kedley, Ryan Schey, Mollie V. Blackburn, Kris Bell, Laura Jiménez
article en

Abstract

In this multiauthrored, polyvocal piece, we, a group of eight literacy researchers reflects on how we engage queer theories and practices to not only make sense of the here-and-now but to foster queer futures in the present. More specifically, we draw on queer theorizations of futurity as grounded in imagination and care to present a series of snapshots in which each scholar individually reflects on a central question, concept, and/or framework animating their current scholarship, followed by a synthesizing conclusion that reflects on queer possibilities for meeting and moving beyond the quagmire of the present. Our intent is to provide a (necessarily incomplete) kaleidoscopic image of current queer literacies research that speaks both to scholars in literacy education and those interested in LGBTQ+ studies in education.

Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
Boston University (US), University of Arizona (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), San Diego State University (US), Rowan University (US), The Ohio State University (US), Arizona State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.