Gender-informed planning and urbanism: practitioner voices, reflective case studies and participatory approaches

Over the last six years, there has been an influx of gender-informed planning and urbanism research and resources owing to more public discourse on violence against women and women’s safety during and after the global COVID-19 pandemic. While understanding the impacts of gender on planning and urbanism is becoming more commonplace, there is insufficient reflection on the lessons learned, particularly from planning practitioners. This article relies on case study analysis in which practitioners reflect and evaluate their work in gender-informed planning and urbanism and academics frame the topic by extending and contextualising the practitioners’ voices. Although these studies operate at different scales – from international, municipal planning to grassroots – the critical role of participatory approaches is a common thread. The article highlights the need to bridge the divide between theory and practice within this topic and recognises the importance of situated knowledge and developing knowledge through action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Town Planning Review
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2026.8
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Gender-informed planning and urbanism: practitioner voices, reflective case studies and participatory approaches

Charlotte Morphet, Sara Candiracci, Marina Milosev, Jenna Dutton et al.
Town Planning Review
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Gender-informed planning and urbanism: practitioner voices, reflective case studies and participatory approaches

Charlotte Morphet, Sara Candiracci, Marina Milosev, Jenna Dutton, Kim Power, Srestha Chaterjee
article en

Abstract

Over the last six years, there has been an influx of gender-informed planning and urbanism research and resources owing to more public discourse on violence against women and women’s safety during and after the global COVID-19 pandemic. While understanding the impacts of gender on planning and urbanism is becoming more commonplace, there is insufficient reflection on the lessons learned, particularly from planning practitioners. This article relies on case study analysis in which practitioners reflect and evaluate their work in gender-informed planning and urbanism and academics frame the topic by extending and contextualising the practitioners’ voices. Although these studies operate at different scales – from international, municipal planning to grassroots – the critical role of participatory approaches is a common thread. The article highlights the need to bridge the divide between theory and practice within this topic and recognises the importance of situated knowledge and developing knowledge through action.

Town Planning Review
University of the West of England (GB), British Red Cross (GB), Observer Research Foundation (IN), Arup Group (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Reading (GB), BTG International (United Kingdom) (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender-informed planning and urbanism: practitioner voices, reflective case studies and participatory approaches — Charlotte Morphet, Sara Candiracci, et al. · Town Planning Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS