Beyond the algorithm: academic developers as digital mediators in Global South higher education

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more embedded in global higher education, its pedagogical value and risks remain contested, especially in resource-constrained, historically marginalised contexts of the Global South. This paper explores how academic developers at two South African Historically Disadvantaged Institutions (HDIs) conceptualise, interpret, and mediate the institutional integration of AI. Drawing on Critical Digital Pedagogy and decolonial perspectives, it frames academic developers not as technical implementers but as digital mediators who bridge pedagogy, ethics, and institutional politics. A thematic analysis of 12 qualitative interviews shows how they translate institutional AI narratives into grounded practice, negotiate shifting professional identities, sustain reflexive and care-oriented pedagogies, and confront the infrastructural inequalities shaping AI adoption in Historically Disadvantaged Institutions. The paper reconceptualises academic development as a form of sociotechnical praxis in which technological change is continually interpreted through ethical, relational, and contextual judgement, advancing debates on AI, academic development, and decolonial digital futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal for Academic Development
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2026.2726310
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Beyond the algorithm: academic developers as digital mediators in Global South higher education

Mashango Phillemon Sithole
The International Journal for Academic Development
Digital Education and Society
article

Beyond the algorithm: academic developers as digital mediators in Global South higher education

Mashango Phillemon Sithole
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more embedded in global higher education, its pedagogical value and risks remain contested, especially in resource-constrained, historically marginalised contexts of the Global South. This paper explores how academic developers at two South African Historically Disadvantaged Institutions (HDIs) conceptualise, interpret, and mediate the institutional integration of AI. Drawing on Critical Digital Pedagogy and decolonial perspectives, it frames academic developers not as technical implementers but as digital mediators who bridge pedagogy, ethics, and institutional politics. A thematic analysis of 12 qualitative interviews shows how they translate institutional AI narratives into grounded practice, negotiate shifting professional identities, sustain reflexive and care-oriented pedagogies, and confront the infrastructural inequalities shaping AI adoption in Historically Disadvantaged Institutions. The paper reconceptualises academic development as a form of sociotechnical praxis in which technological change is continually interpreted through ethical, relational, and contextual judgement, advancing debates on AI, academic development, and decolonial digital futures.

The International Journal for Academic Development
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond the algorithm: academic developers as digital mediators in Global South higher education — Mashango Phillemon Sithole · The International Journal for Academic Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS