AI Marketing Capabilities and Purchase Intention in Indonesian E-Commerce: Mediating Effects of Platform Trust and AI Transparency, and a Strategic Marketing and Digital Human Resource Capability Perspective

Background AI-driven personalized marketing is increasingly important in e-commerce, yet how personalization translates into purchase intention remains underexplored. Platform Trust and AI Transparency have received limited empirical attention as mediating mechanisms, particularly in the Indonesian context. Methods A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted from February to March 2025 among 248 active e-commerce users in Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Bandung, and Surabaya. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS 4, with 5,000 bootstrap resamples to assess direct and mediated effects. Results The measurement model demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity (outer loadings 0.719–0.902; Cronbach’s alpha 0.757–0.882; composite reliability 0.846–0.925; AVE 0.578–0.803; HTMT <0.85). The model explained 60.4% of Purchase Intention, 46.2% of Platform Trust, and 33.2% of AI Transparency. Perceived Personalization had the strongest association with Platform Trust (beta = 0.442, p < 0.001), while its largest mediated effect on Purchase Intention operated through Platform Trust (beta = 0.125, p < 0.001). Perceived Usefulness directly predicted Purchase Intention (beta = 0.205, p < 0.001) and also showed significant indirect effects through both mediators. AI Responsiveness operated primarily through Platform Trust (beta = 0.056) and AI Transparency (beta = 0.057). All six mediation paths were significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions Within the limits of the cross-sectional design, personalization and AI responsiveness were not primarily associated with purchase intention as standalone predictors; their effects operated substantially through Platform Trust and, to a lesser extent, AI Transparency. The findings suggest that AI marketing capabilities generate commercial value when translated into relational and cognitive assets. Platforms should therefore combine personalization and responsiveness with trust-building mechanisms, interpretable recommendations, and adequate digital capabilities. Longitudinal or experimental research is needed to establish temporal and causal relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.188717.1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

AI Marketing Capabilities and Purchase Intention in Indonesian E-Commerce: Mediating Effects of Platform Trust and AI Transparency, and a Strategic Marketing and Digital Human Resource Capability Perspective

Dwi Nanda Akhmad Romadhon, Rifa’atussalwa Hayati, AHMAD RASYIDDIN, Nur Azis et al.
F1000Research
AI in Service Interactions
article

AI Marketing Capabilities and Purchase Intention in Indonesian E-Commerce: Mediating Effects of Platform Trust and AI Transparency, and a Strategic Marketing and Digital Human Resource Capability Perspective

Dwi Nanda Akhmad Romadhon, Rifa’atussalwa Hayati, AHMAD RASYIDDIN, Nur Azis, Diksi Metris, Agus Rahayu, Puspo Dewi Dirgantari
article en

Abstract

Background AI-driven personalized marketing is increasingly important in e-commerce, yet how personalization translates into purchase intention remains underexplored. Platform Trust and AI Transparency have received limited empirical attention as mediating mechanisms, particularly in the Indonesian context. Methods A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted from February to March 2025 among 248 active e-commerce users in Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Bandung, and Surabaya. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS 4, with 5,000 bootstrap resamples to assess direct and mediated effects. Results The measurement model demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity (outer loadings 0.719–0.902; Cronbach’s alpha 0.757–0.882; composite reliability 0.846–0.925; AVE 0.578–0.803; HTMT <0.85). The model explained 60.4% of Purchase Intention, 46.2% of Platform Trust, and 33.2% of AI Transparency. Perceived Personalization had the strongest association with Platform Trust (beta = 0.442, p < 0.001), while its largest mediated effect on Purchase Intention operated through Platform Trust (beta = 0.125, p < 0.001). Perceived Usefulness directly predicted Purchase Intention (beta = 0.205, p < 0.001) and also showed significant indirect effects through both mediators. AI Responsiveness operated primarily through Platform Trust (beta = 0.056) and AI Transparency (beta = 0.057). All six mediation paths were significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions Within the limits of the cross-sectional design, personalization and AI responsiveness were not primarily associated with purchase intention as standalone predictors; their effects operated substantially through Platform Trust and, to a lesser extent, AI Transparency. The findings suggest that AI marketing capabilities generate commercial value when translated into relational and cognitive assets. Platforms should therefore combine personalization and responsiveness with trust-building mechanisms, interpretable recommendations, and adequate digital capabilities. Longitudinal or experimental research is needed to establish temporal and causal relationships.

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Indonesia University of Education (ID), Surya University (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang (ID), Universitas Pramita Indonesia (ID)
Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.