Real‐World External Validation of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Full‐Vessel Segmentation for Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) allows automated evaluation of intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. However, algorithms are mostly developed and validated on well-curated data sets, which may not represent real-world data. We sought to externally validate a previously developed algorithm performing full-vessel segmentation for OCT in an unselected consecutive real-world data set. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, external validation study comprising 100 consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated OCT. A previously developed AI algorithm (OCT-AID) was used for automated pixelwise labeling of OCT images, distinguishing among lumen, guidewire artifact, intima, media, lipid plaque, calcium plaque, side branch, plaque rupture, thrombus, microvessel, and background. The AI-based predictions were compared on a frame level to the reference standard obtained through manual OCT image analysis by expert readers. RESULTS: Among 2560 analyzable frames, the agreement between the automated OCT image analysis and the reference standard was excellent for calcified plaque identification (κ=0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.92]) and quantification (intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged between 0.79 and 0.93), with a performance close to interobserver variability. For lipid plaque identification and quantification, the model performance was reasonable (κ=0.68 [95% CI, 0.64-0.72]; intraclass correlation coefficient for lipid arc, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.76-0.81]; intraclass correlation coefficient for minimum fibrous cap thickness, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.55-0.63]) and largely superior to interobserver variability. The algorithm performance for low-prevalence features (e.g., plaque rupture) was limited. CONCLUSIONS: AI-based fully automated evaluation of OCT images is feasible with performances consistent with interobserver variability in a real-world data set of consecutive patients, supporting generalizability of the proposed methodology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.049353
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Real‐World External Validation of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Full‐Vessel Segmentation for Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography

Aysun Cetinyurek‐Yavuz, Craig R. Porter, Pierandrea Cancian, Allen Jeremias et al.
Journal of the American Heart Association
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Real‐World External Validation of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Full‐Vessel Segmentation for Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography

Aysun Cetinyurek‐Yavuz, Craig R. Porter, Pierandrea Cancian, Allen Jeremias, Jos Thannhauser, Bram van Ginneken, Evan Shlofmitz, Joske van der Zande, Ziad A. Ali, Rick Volleberg, Niels van Royen, Simone Saitta, Susan Thomas, Richard Shlofmitz, Doosup Shin, Clara I. Sá‎nchez, Ivana Išgum, Xiaojin Gu, Ruben van der Waerden, Thijs Luttikholt, Fernando Sosa, Leah Heil
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) allows automated evaluation of intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. However, algorithms are mostly developed and validated on well-curated data sets, which may not represent real-world data. We sought to externally validate a previously developed algorithm performing full-vessel segmentation for OCT in an unselected consecutive real-world data set. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, external validation study comprising 100 consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated OCT. A previously developed AI algorithm (OCT-AID) was used for automated pixelwise labeling of OCT images, distinguishing among lumen, guidewire artifact, intima, media, lipid plaque, calcium plaque, side branch, plaque rupture, thrombus, microvessel, and background. The AI-based predictions were compared on a frame level to the reference standard obtained through manual OCT image analysis by expert readers. RESULTS: Among 2560 analyzable frames, the agreement between the automated OCT image analysis and the reference standard was excellent for calcified plaque identification (κ=0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.92]) and quantification (intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged between 0.79 and 0.93), with a performance close to interobserver variability. For lipid plaque identification and quantification, the model performance was reasonable (κ=0.68 [95% CI, 0.64-0.72]; intraclass correlation coefficient for lipid arc, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.76-0.81]; intraclass correlation coefficient for minimum fibrous cap thickness, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.55-0.63]) and largely superior to interobserver variability. The algorithm performance for low-prevalence features (e.g., plaque rupture) was limited. CONCLUSIONS: AI-based fully automated evaluation of OCT images is feasible with performances consistent with interobserver variability in a real-world data set of consecutive patients, supporting generalizability of the proposed methodology.

Journal of the American Heart Association
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), WinnMed (US), University Medical Center (US), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), St. Francis Hospital (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.