Real‐World External Validation of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Full‐Vessel Segmentation for Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) allows automated evaluation of intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. However, algorithms are mostly developed and validated on well-curated data sets, which may not represent real-world data. We sought to externally validate a previously developed algorithm performing full-vessel segmentation for OCT in an unselected consecutive real-world data set. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, external validation study comprising 100 consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated OCT. A previously developed AI algorithm (OCT-AID) was used for automated pixelwise labeling of OCT images, distinguishing among lumen, guidewire artifact, intima, media, lipid plaque, calcium plaque, side branch, plaque rupture, thrombus, microvessel, and background. The AI-based predictions were compared on a frame level to the reference standard obtained through manual OCT image analysis by expert readers. RESULTS: Among 2560 analyzable frames, the agreement between the automated OCT image analysis and the reference standard was excellent for calcified plaque identification (κ=0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.92]) and quantification (intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged between 0.79 and 0.93), with a performance close to interobserver variability. For lipid plaque identification and quantification, the model performance was reasonable (κ=0.68 [95% CI, 0.64-0.72]; intraclass correlation coefficient for lipid arc, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.76-0.81]; intraclass correlation coefficient for minimum fibrous cap thickness, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.55-0.63]) and largely superior to interobserver variability. The algorithm performance for low-prevalence features (e.g., plaque rupture) was limited. CONCLUSIONS: AI-based fully automated evaluation of OCT images is feasible with performances consistent with interobserver variability in a real-world data set of consecutive patients, supporting generalizability of the proposed methodology.
Authors
- Aysun Cetinyurek‐Yavuz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4024-8775)
- Craig R. Porter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6926-0244)
- Pierandrea Cancian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5191-6180)
- Allen Jeremias (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2328-4686)
- Jos Thannhauser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8605-0436)
- Bram van Ginneken (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-8972)
- Evan Shlofmitz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0907-5258)
- Joske van der Zande (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4998-6363)
- Ziad A. Ali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2482-3197)
- Rick Volleberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7471-1006)
- Niels van Royen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6136-8640)
- Simone Saitta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3974-5945)
- Susan Thomas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1948-9462)
- Richard Shlofmitz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9422-048X)
- Doosup Shin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4960-5732)
- Clara I. Sánchez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9787-8319)
- Ivana Išgum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1869-5034)
- Xiaojin Gu
- Ruben van der Waerden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8462-1216)
- Thijs Luttikholt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7706-5000)
- Fernando Sosa
- Leah Heil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2540-9363)
Institutions
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- WinnMed (US)
- University Medical Center (US)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- St. Francis Hospital (US)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the American Heart Association
- Published
- 2026-09-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.049353
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00