Elites and institutional legacies: The political explanations for Libya’s transition

Research on post-2011 Middle East and North Africa transitions has examined divergent regional trajectories, but little explains what follows complete institutional collapse in conflict-affected settings, or how domestic political factors shape such paths. This article addresses that gap by analysing how domestic political factors shaped political uncertainty in Libya’s post-2011 transition. It draws on qualitative content analysis and 26 semi-structured interviews with Libyan political actors, tracing three domestic factors through distinct causal pathways. Elite reproduction, the retention of former Gaddafi regime members in key positions, was necessary but not sufficient, becoming consequential only when combined with alliances between former elites and non-state armed groups. Constitutional weakness was a contributory factor, generating ambiguities that elites exploited to contest authority and delay elections. Early elections were a secondary factor, contributing to provincial fragmentation without driving the broader trajectory. These findings advance debates on how domestic political factors interact with security dynamics in conflict-affected transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957261486400
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Elites and institutional legacies: The political explanations for Libya’s transition

Walid Ali
Politics
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Elites and institutional legacies: The political explanations for Libya’s transition

Walid Ali
article en

Abstract

Research on post-2011 Middle East and North Africa transitions has examined divergent regional trajectories, but little explains what follows complete institutional collapse in conflict-affected settings, or how domestic political factors shape such paths. This article addresses that gap by analysing how domestic political factors shaped political uncertainty in Libya’s post-2011 transition. It draws on qualitative content analysis and 26 semi-structured interviews with Libyan political actors, tracing three domestic factors through distinct causal pathways. Elite reproduction, the retention of former Gaddafi regime members in key positions, was necessary but not sufficient, becoming consequential only when combined with alliances between former elites and non-state armed groups. Constitutional weakness was a contributory factor, generating ambiguities that elites exploited to contest authority and delay elections. Early elections were a secondary factor, contributing to provincial fragmentation without driving the broader trajectory. These findings advance debates on how domestic political factors interact with security dynamics in conflict-affected transitions.

Politics
University of Glasgow (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Elites and institutional legacies: The political explanations for Libya’s transition — Walid Ali · Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS