“Between protection and betrayal: Discursive struggles over Austrian neutrality after 2022”

Neutrality has long been central to Austrian national identity, symbolising independence, humanitarianism, distinctiveness within Europe, and nationhood itself. Since its inception in 1955, it has been discursively contested at critical junctures such as Austria’s accession to the European Union. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 reactivated and destabilised this cornerstone of Austrian national identity, sparking renewed debate about its meaning. This article examines how neutrality was defended, redefined, and contested across politics, traditional media, and social media between February 2022 and September 2025. Drawing on a German-language corpus of 8625 texts, the study integrates the Discourse-Historical Approach with corpus-based argumentation and narrative analysis to identify recurring topoi and narratives. Results show field-specific patterns: politics mobilises topoi episodically, media routinises them in polarised coverage, and social media refracts them into volatile and populist framings. The findings confirm neutrality’s resilience but highlight mounting pressures from European integration, economic crisis, and far-right populist co-optation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse & Communication
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813261483848
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

“Between protection and betrayal: Discursive struggles over Austrian neutrality after 2022”

Markus Rheindorf
Discourse & Communication
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

“Between protection and betrayal: Discursive struggles over Austrian neutrality after 2022”

Markus Rheindorf
article en

Abstract

Neutrality has long been central to Austrian national identity, symbolising independence, humanitarianism, distinctiveness within Europe, and nationhood itself. Since its inception in 1955, it has been discursively contested at critical junctures such as Austria’s accession to the European Union. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 reactivated and destabilised this cornerstone of Austrian national identity, sparking renewed debate about its meaning. This article examines how neutrality was defended, redefined, and contested across politics, traditional media, and social media between February 2022 and September 2025. Drawing on a German-language corpus of 8625 texts, the study integrates the Discourse-Historical Approach with corpus-based argumentation and narrative analysis to identify recurring topoi and narratives. Results show field-specific patterns: politics mobilises topoi episodically, media routinises them in polarised coverage, and social media refracts them into volatile and populist framings. The findings confirm neutrality’s resilience but highlight mounting pressures from European integration, economic crisis, and far-right populist co-optation.

Discourse & Communication
University of Vienna (AT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.