A phenomenological approach in special education: Deconstructing and reconstructing the modern philosophical underpinnings

This paper seeks to critique constructivism and realism from the perspective of students with pneumatic disabilities. Pneumatic disabilities are defined as disabilities that have limited or no physical cause such as Emotional Disturbance, Other Health Impairment, and Learning Disability. Constructivism and realism are criticized as having an undesirable perspective for educating students with pneumatic disabilities and being epistemologically invalid. An alternative of phenomenology is laid out to potentially create a framework for students with pneumatic disabilities. This centers on three areas, understanding thinking in time, dialogic goals, and common language as a contractual framework. The potential of an alternative approach to understanding and teaching students who often struggle with general education could help reform educating these and other students. An application of how this approach would look in practice is also included to bridge the gap between the theoretical and the practical centering on the students perspective being understood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2026.2733628
Primary Topic
Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A phenomenological approach in special education: Deconstructing and reconstructing the modern philosophical underpinnings

C. W. Warne
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
article

A phenomenological approach in special education: Deconstructing and reconstructing the modern philosophical underpinnings

C. W. Warne
article en

Abstract

This paper seeks to critique constructivism and realism from the perspective of students with pneumatic disabilities. Pneumatic disabilities are defined as disabilities that have limited or no physical cause such as Emotional Disturbance, Other Health Impairment, and Learning Disability. Constructivism and realism are criticized as having an undesirable perspective for educating students with pneumatic disabilities and being epistemologically invalid. An alternative of phenomenology is laid out to potentially create a framework for students with pneumatic disabilities. This centers on three areas, understanding thinking in time, dialogic goals, and common language as a contractual framework. The potential of an alternative approach to understanding and teaching students who often struggle with general education could help reform educating these and other students. An application of how this approach would look in practice is also included to bridge the gap between the theoretical and the practical centering on the students perspective being understood.

Educational Philosophy and Theory
University of Maine (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A phenomenological approach in special education: Deconstructing and reconstructing the modern philosophical underpinnings — C. W. Warne · Educational Philosophy and Theory (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS