A Multi‐Dimensional Framework to Assess Sustainable Development: A Cross‐Country Analysis

ABSTRACT Reliable and transparent measurement frameworks are essential for effective sustainability policymaking. However, many widely used composite indices rely on subjective weighting schemes and compensatory aggregation methods, which may undermine cross‐country comparability and policy relevance. This study applies a Pareto‐based, non‐compensatory composite index methodology to reassess sustainable development across 128 countries. Using a parsimonious set of 18 indicators spanning economic, social, and environmental dimensions, the study constructs a Sustainable Development Index (SDI) that reduces reliance on arbitrary methodological choices while preserving the multidimensional structure of sustainability. The analysis is complemented by K‐means clustering to identify distinct country groups based on their sustainability profiles, revealing heterogeneous development patterns. To enhance policy relevance, cluster‐level SDI results are analysed alongside Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Index scores, providing insights into how underlying structural conditions relate to observed SDG performance. The findings support the development of context‐sensitive, cluster‐specific policy recommendations aimed at accelerating progress toward the 2030 Agenda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71667
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Multi‐Dimensional Framework to Assess Sustainable Development: A Cross‐Country Analysis

Elif Göksu Öztürk
Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
article

A Multi‐Dimensional Framework to Assess Sustainable Development: A Cross‐Country Analysis

Elif Göksu Öztürk
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reliable and transparent measurement frameworks are essential for effective sustainability policymaking. However, many widely used composite indices rely on subjective weighting schemes and compensatory aggregation methods, which may undermine cross‐country comparability and policy relevance. This study applies a Pareto‐based, non‐compensatory composite index methodology to reassess sustainable development across 128 countries. Using a parsimonious set of 18 indicators spanning economic, social, and environmental dimensions, the study constructs a Sustainable Development Index (SDI) that reduces reliance on arbitrary methodological choices while preserving the multidimensional structure of sustainability. The analysis is complemented by K‐means clustering to identify distinct country groups based on their sustainability profiles, revealing heterogeneous development patterns. To enhance policy relevance, cluster‐level SDI results are analysed alongside Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Index scores, providing insights into how underlying structural conditions relate to observed SDG performance. The findings support the development of context‐sensitive, cluster‐specific policy recommendations aimed at accelerating progress toward the 2030 Agenda.

Sustainable Development
Instituto Superior de Contabilidade e Administracao do Porto (PT), Polytechnic Institute of Porto (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Multi‐Dimensional Framework to Assess Sustainable Development: A Cross‐Country Analysis — Elif Göksu Öztürk · Sustainable Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS