Spending Responses to Direct Cash Assistance to Low-Income Adults

Abstract This paper examines individuals’ use of one-time direct cash assistance of $1,400 provided to over 2000 low-income individuals in 2022. Survey results demonstrate that nearly all recipients paid down debt or spent the assistance; very few recipients saved the check. This result differs from broad-based one-time assistance payments but is consistent with other assistance payments provided to low-income individuals. The main categories of spending are recurring bills, debt payments, food, housing or auto repairs, and transportation. The estimated marginal propensity to consume is 0.69. Individuals’ use of the assistance was primarily associated with household debt prior to receiving the assistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Basic Income Studies
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2025-0025
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Spending Responses to Direct Cash Assistance to Low-Income Adults

Jerry Anthony, David Frisvold, Ain Grooms, George Wehby et al.
Basic Income Studies
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
article

Spending Responses to Direct Cash Assistance to Low-Income Adults

Jerry Anthony, David Frisvold, Ain Grooms, George Wehby, Christopher Odinet
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines individuals’ use of one-time direct cash assistance of $1,400 provided to over 2000 low-income individuals in 2022. Survey results demonstrate that nearly all recipients paid down debt or spent the assistance; very few recipients saved the check. This result differs from broad-based one-time assistance payments but is consistent with other assistance payments provided to low-income individuals. The main categories of spending are recurring bills, debt payments, food, housing or auto repairs, and transportation. The estimated marginal propensity to consume is 0.69. Individuals’ use of the assistance was primarily associated with household debt prior to receiving the assistance.

Basic Income Studies
University of Iowa (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), East Texas A&M University (US), Texas A&M University School of Law (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spending Responses to Direct Cash Assistance to Low-Income Adults — Jerry Anthony, David Frisvold, et al. · Basic Income Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS