Failure mechanisms of underground compressed air energy storage caverns under ultimate air-storage conditions: Insights from physical model testing and numerical analysis

This study investigates the failure mechanisms of underground compressed air energy storage (CAES) caverns under ultimate air-storage conditions through an integrated approach combining large-scale physical model testing and thermo-mechanically coupled phase-field simulations. The physical model tests reveal that underground CAES caverns predominantly exhibit tensile-dominated brittle failure, with deformation evolving from an initial linear elastic response to nonlinear damage accumulation before catastrophic structural instability occurs. The developed phase-field framework successfully reproduces the experimentally observed fracture initiation and propagation processes, demonstrating its capability for predicting the ultimate failure behavior of underground CAES caverns. The results further demonstrate that in-situ stress conditions significantly enhance the ultimate pressure-bearing capacity of underground CAES caverns, while the lateral pressure coefficient governs both fracture morphology and propagation direction. Comparative analyses of different lining systems indicate that reinforced concrete markedly improves the load-bearing capacity and crack resistance of underground caverns, whereas flexible concrete effectively suppresses lining damage and enhances overall structural integrity. These findings provide new insights into the ultimate failure mechanisms of underground CAES caverns and offer important theoretical guidance for anti-cracking design, lining optimization, and the safe development of underground compressed air energy storage systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2026.124401
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Failure mechanisms of underground compressed air energy storage caverns under ultimate air-storage conditions: Insights from physical model testing and numerical analysis

Timon Rabczuk, Caichu Xia, Yingjun Xu, Xiaoying Zhuang et al.
Journal of Energy Storage
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
article

Failure mechanisms of underground compressed air energy storage caverns under ultimate air-storage conditions: Insights from physical model testing and numerical analysis

Timon Rabczuk, Caichu Xia, Yingjun Xu, Xiaoying Zhuang, Sheng Wang, Shanpeng Cao, Chen Xu
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the failure mechanisms of underground compressed air energy storage (CAES) caverns under ultimate air-storage conditions through an integrated approach combining large-scale physical model testing and thermo-mechanically coupled phase-field simulations. The physical model tests reveal that underground CAES caverns predominantly exhibit tensile-dominated brittle failure, with deformation evolving from an initial linear elastic response to nonlinear damage accumulation before catastrophic structural instability occurs. The developed phase-field framework successfully reproduces the experimentally observed fracture initiation and propagation processes, demonstrating its capability for predicting the ultimate failure behavior of underground CAES caverns. The results further demonstrate that in-situ stress conditions significantly enhance the ultimate pressure-bearing capacity of underground CAES caverns, while the lateral pressure coefficient governs both fracture morphology and propagation direction. Comparative analyses of different lining systems indicate that reinforced concrete markedly improves the load-bearing capacity and crack resistance of underground caverns, whereas flexible concrete effectively suppresses lining damage and enhances overall structural integrity. These findings provide new insights into the ultimate failure mechanisms of underground CAES caverns and offer important theoretical guidance for anti-cracking design, lining optimization, and the safe development of underground compressed air energy storage systems.

Journal of Energy StorageVol. 182
Ningbo University (CN), Tongji University (CN), China Construction Eighth Engineering Division (China) (CN), Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (DE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Key Technologies Research and Development Program
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.