Deliberating with stories: Exploring the nature and role of small stories as informal deliberation in an online community

Civil discourse and deliberation, formal and informal, can bridge ideological divides and strengthen democracies. Research has shown that social media can be useful spaces for informal political deliberation. However, less attention has been given to the specific rhetorical tools that aid informal deliberation online. This study explores one rhetorical tactic known to be persuasive and to foster political deliberation: storytelling. Through the framework of “small stories”—short, fleeting narratives found in everyday conversation—we explore the nature of these stories and how they function as informal deliberation in the subreddit r/ChangeMyView, an online community dedicated to good faith social and political discussions. Using qualitative content analysis, we find that small stories, both explicated and evoked, are a prominent deliberative tactic, varying in voice, tense, and genre. These stories functioned to reframe arguments, invite participants into the stories, and establish credibility in an anonymous forum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication and Democracy
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2026.2731553
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Deliberating with stories: Exploring the nature and role of small stories as informal deliberation in an online community

Diana Zulli, Ryan N. Funkhouser
Communication and Democracy
Social Media and Politics
article

Deliberating with stories: Exploring the nature and role of small stories as informal deliberation in an online community

Diana Zulli, Ryan N. Funkhouser
article en

Abstract

Civil discourse and deliberation, formal and informal, can bridge ideological divides and strengthen democracies. Research has shown that social media can be useful spaces for informal political deliberation. However, less attention has been given to the specific rhetorical tools that aid informal deliberation online. This study explores one rhetorical tactic known to be persuasive and to foster political deliberation: storytelling. Through the framework of “small stories”—short, fleeting narratives found in everyday conversation—we explore the nature of these stories and how they function as informal deliberation in the subreddit r/ChangeMyView, an online community dedicated to good faith social and political discussions. Using qualitative content analysis, we find that small stories, both explicated and evoked, are a prominent deliberative tactic, varying in voice, tense, and genre. These stories functioned to reframe arguments, invite participants into the stories, and establish credibility in an anonymous forum.

Communication and Democracy
University of Idaho (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deliberating with stories: Exploring the nature and role of small stories as informal deliberation in an online community — Diana Zulli, Ryan N. Funkhouser · Communication and Democracy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS