Prospecting the protein design landscape

Generative AI has driven remarkable breakthroughs in protein design, enabling the rapid, computationally guided creation of high-affinity binders against diverse targets. While remarkable experimental success has been demonstrated, the confidence metrics used to filter and evaluate designs remain optimized for static protein interfaces and can fail when applied to underrepresented or conformationally complex targets. In this review, we outline the current landscape of deep learning-driven protein design pipelines, discuss tailored applications in peptide, small molecule, binder, vaccine, and antibody design, and argue that the integration of ensemble-based methods represents a promising avenue for improving design success rates. Beyond single target binder design, we further highlight emerging strategies that expand the functional scope of designed proteins, including fold-switching scaffolds and molecular glues realized through engineered cyclic peptides, which enable context-dependent control of protein-protein interaction networks. Together, these advances position de novo protein design as a broadly applicable technology platform at the intersection of structural biology, biophysics, and molecular medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FEBS Letters
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.70459
Primary Topic
Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Prospecting the protein design landscape

Jens Meiler, Monica L. Fernández‐Quintero, Jakob R. Riccabona, Clara T. Schoeder et al.
FEBS Letters
Biochemical and Structural Characterization
article

Prospecting the protein design landscape

Jens Meiler, Monica L. Fernández‐Quintero, Jakob R. Riccabona, Clara T. Schoeder, Katharina T. Stonig
article en

Abstract

Generative AI has driven remarkable breakthroughs in protein design, enabling the rapid, computationally guided creation of high-affinity binders against diverse targets. While remarkable experimental success has been demonstrated, the confidence metrics used to filter and evaluate designs remain optimized for static protein interfaces and can fail when applied to underrepresented or conformationally complex targets. In this review, we outline the current landscape of deep learning-driven protein design pipelines, discuss tailored applications in peptide, small molecule, binder, vaccine, and antibody design, and argue that the integration of ensemble-based methods represents a promising avenue for improving design success rates. Beyond single target binder design, we further highlight emerging strategies that expand the functional scope of designed proteins, including fold-switching scaffolds and molecular glues realized through engineered cyclic peptides, which enable context-dependent control of protein-protein interaction networks. Together, these advances position de novo protein design as a broadly applicable technology platform at the intersection of structural biology, biophysics, and molecular medicine.

FEBS Letters
Scripps Research Institute (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK), German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE), Independent Dance (GB), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Biochemical and Structural Characterization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prospecting the protein design landscape — Jens Meiler, Monica L. Fernández‐Quintero, et al. · FEBS Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS