Quantifying energy–cost–carbon tradeoffs in China's onshore wind expansion: A life cycle-based turbine design optimization

China's onshore wind expansion must reconcile electricity generation, life-cycle cost, and life-cycle carbon emissions across heterogeneous wind regimes. We develop a region-specific assessment and turbine-design optimization framework linking rotor diameter and hub height to annual energy production, life-cycle cost, and greenhouse gas emissions from component manufacturing to grid delivery. Spatial screening identifies 2.61 million km 2 of eligible land, representing 27.2% of China's land area. Under a uniform-design assessment using the reference wind speed, maximum geometric capacity reaches 10.1 TW, with gross generation of 30 PWh/yr and 10.6 PWh/yr after an idealized infinite-array adjustment. Separate national optimizations select turbine configurations across wind-speed zones under generation, cost, and carbon constraints, assuming full development of eligible land and using gross generation. The minimum-unit-cost solution generates 38.2 PWh/yr at 0.25 CNY/kWh and a carbon intensity of 15.0 g CO₂-eq/kWh. Minimizing carbon intensity lowers it to 13.3 g CO₂-eq/kWh but raises unit cost to 0.75 CNY/kWh, with generation of 40.2 PWh/yr. Selected turbine dimensions and rated powers generally decrease beyond their respective peaks in low-to-intermediate wind-speed zones; the minimum‑carbon-intensity solution generally favors larger rotors and higher-rated turbines. By quantifying energy–cost–carbon trade-offs, the framework supports turbine selection tailored to regional wind conditions and economic or carbon objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108724
Primary Topic
Wind Energy Research and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Quantifying energy–cost–carbon tradeoffs in China's onshore wind expansion: A life cycle-based turbine design optimization

Jianchuan Qi, Chuke Chen, Simeng Chen, Huimin Chang et al.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Wind Energy Research and Development
article

Quantifying energy–cost–carbon tradeoffs in China's onshore wind expansion: A life cycle-based turbine design optimization

Jianchuan Qi, Chuke Chen, Simeng Chen, Huimin Chang, Ruru Han, Ming Xu, Jing Guo, Changqing Xu, Jian Zuo, Nan Li
article en

Abstract

China's onshore wind expansion must reconcile electricity generation, life-cycle cost, and life-cycle carbon emissions across heterogeneous wind regimes. We develop a region-specific assessment and turbine-design optimization framework linking rotor diameter and hub height to annual energy production, life-cycle cost, and greenhouse gas emissions from component manufacturing to grid delivery. Spatial screening identifies 2.61 million km 2 of eligible land, representing 27.2% of China's land area. Under a uniform-design assessment using the reference wind speed, maximum geometric capacity reaches 10.1 TW, with gross generation of 30 PWh/yr and 10.6 PWh/yr after an idealized infinite-array adjustment. Separate national optimizations select turbine configurations across wind-speed zones under generation, cost, and carbon constraints, assuming full development of eligible land and using gross generation. The minimum-unit-cost solution generates 38.2 PWh/yr at 0.25 CNY/kWh and a carbon intensity of 15.0 g CO₂-eq/kWh. Minimizing carbon intensity lowers it to 13.3 g CO₂-eq/kWh but raises unit cost to 0.75 CNY/kWh, with generation of 40.2 PWh/yr. Selected turbine dimensions and rated powers generally decrease beyond their respective peaks in low-to-intermediate wind-speed zones; the minimum‑carbon-intensity solution generally favors larger rotors and higher-rated turbines. By quantifying energy–cost–carbon trade-offs, the framework supports turbine selection tailored to regional wind conditions and economic or carbon objectives.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 123
University of South Australia (AU), China National Commission for Disaster Reduction (CN), Suzhou Research Institute (CN), The University of Adelaide (AU), Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Wind Energy Research and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.