Dentists' Knowledge and Clinical Practice Regarding Splinting After Dental Trauma: A Guideline‐Based Cross‐Sectional Study

BACKGROUND/AIM: Traumatic dental injuries require prompt, guideline-based management, and splinting is critical for healing and prognosis. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess and compare International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guideline-based splinting knowledge among general dentists and dental specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic cross-sectional questionnaire assessing IADT guideline-based splinting knowledge was distributed to general dentists and specialists in pediatric dentistry, endodontics, and oral and maxillofacial surgery. The questionnaire (Google Forms) comprised 20 items, including 9 knowledge-based questions on splinting, and was disseminated via e-mail, WhatsApp groups, and dental associations; participation was voluntary and electronic informed consent was obtained. A total knowledge score was calculated (range: 0-16), with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of splinting after dental trauma. The total knowledge score was defined as the dependent variable and its associations with participants' demographic and occupational characteristics were assessed statistically. RESULTS: A total of 214 dentists responded to the questionnaire. Self-perceived knowledge of traumatic dental injury management was mostly low-to-moderate (1.9% not knowledgeable, 15.4% slightly knowledgeable, 41.1% moderately knowledgeable, 37.9% knowledgeable, 3.7% very knowledgeable). Consulting an experienced colleague was the most common resource (49.3%), followed by guidelines (41.7%) and ToothSOS (9.0%). Avulsion was the most frequently selected indication for splinting (32.5%); 56.1% identified passive-flexible splints as recommended, while 17.2% did not know the recommended type. Knowledge of IADT-based splinting was highest among pediatric dentists (13.44 ± 1.64), followed by endodontists (12.77 ± 1.90), whereas general dentists (9.89 ± 2.27) had the lowest total knowledge scores. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of IADT-based splinting after dental trauma varied according to specialty and professional experience. Lower knowledge scores were associated with longer professional experience and preference for consulting colleagues rather than guideline-based resources. Continuous professional education may improve adherence to current trauma guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dental Traumatology
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.70132
Primary Topic
Dental Trauma and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Dentists' Knowledge and Clinical Practice Regarding Splinting After Dental Trauma: A Guideline‐Based Cross‐Sectional Study

Zeynep Şeyda Yavşan, Gülçin Cagay Sevencan
Dental Traumatology
Dental Trauma and Treatments
article

Dentists' Knowledge and Clinical Practice Regarding Splinting After Dental Trauma: A Guideline‐Based Cross‐Sectional Study

Zeynep Şeyda Yavşan, Gülçin Cagay Sevencan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Traumatic dental injuries require prompt, guideline-based management, and splinting is critical for healing and prognosis. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess and compare International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guideline-based splinting knowledge among general dentists and dental specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic cross-sectional questionnaire assessing IADT guideline-based splinting knowledge was distributed to general dentists and specialists in pediatric dentistry, endodontics, and oral and maxillofacial surgery. The questionnaire (Google Forms) comprised 20 items, including 9 knowledge-based questions on splinting, and was disseminated via e-mail, WhatsApp groups, and dental associations; participation was voluntary and electronic informed consent was obtained. A total knowledge score was calculated (range: 0-16), with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of splinting after dental trauma. The total knowledge score was defined as the dependent variable and its associations with participants' demographic and occupational characteristics were assessed statistically. RESULTS: A total of 214 dentists responded to the questionnaire. Self-perceived knowledge of traumatic dental injury management was mostly low-to-moderate (1.9% not knowledgeable, 15.4% slightly knowledgeable, 41.1% moderately knowledgeable, 37.9% knowledgeable, 3.7% very knowledgeable). Consulting an experienced colleague was the most common resource (49.3%), followed by guidelines (41.7%) and ToothSOS (9.0%). Avulsion was the most frequently selected indication for splinting (32.5%); 56.1% identified passive-flexible splints as recommended, while 17.2% did not know the recommended type. Knowledge of IADT-based splinting was highest among pediatric dentists (13.44 ± 1.64), followed by endodontists (12.77 ± 1.90), whereas general dentists (9.89 ± 2.27) had the lowest total knowledge scores. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of IADT-based splinting after dental trauma varied according to specialty and professional experience. Lower knowledge scores were associated with longer professional experience and preference for consulting colleagues rather than guideline-based resources. Continuous professional education may improve adherence to current trauma guidelines.

Dental Traumatology
Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Trauma and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.