Between usury and legitimate profit: confessional normative frameworks and the five per cent contract in early modern Germany

This article examines how confessional normative frameworks shaped the regulation of financial transactions in early modern Germany through a comparison of the Jesuit theologian Gregorio de Valencia (1549–1603) and the Lutheran theologian Theodor Thumm (1586–1630). Both addressed the so-called five per cent contract, a financial arrangement designed to secure a fixed annual return while formally avoiding the prohibition of interest. Valencia developed a casuistic analysis centred on the nature of the contract, valid legal title, and the intention of the parties. Thumm, by contrast, evaluated the legitimacy of profit primarily through Scripture, Christian charity, and the authority of the political magistrate. The article argues that these distinct confessional frameworks shaped understandings of legitimate profit, risk, contractual justice, and the relationship between conscience and political authority.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Legal History
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677x.2026.2726704
Primary Topic
Historical Economic and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Between usury and legitimate profit: confessional normative frameworks and the five per cent contract in early modern Germany

Paolo Astorri
Comparative Legal History
Historical Economic and Social Studies
article

Between usury and legitimate profit: confessional normative frameworks and the five per cent contract in early modern Germany

Paolo Astorri
article en

Abstract

This article examines how confessional normative frameworks shaped the regulation of financial transactions in early modern Germany through a comparison of the Jesuit theologian Gregorio de Valencia (1549–1603) and the Lutheran theologian Theodor Thumm (1586–1630). Both addressed the so-called five per cent contract, a financial arrangement designed to secure a fixed annual return while formally avoiding the prohibition of interest. Valencia developed a casuistic analysis centred on the nature of the contract, valid legal title, and the intention of the parties. Thumm, by contrast, evaluated the legitimacy of profit primarily through Scripture, Christian charity, and the authority of the political magistrate. The article argues that these distinct confessional frameworks shaped understandings of legitimate profit, risk, contractual justice, and the relationship between conscience and political authority.

Comparative Legal History
Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Historical Economic and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between usury and legitimate profit: confessional normative frameworks and the five per cent contract in early modern Germany — Paolo Astorri · Comparative Legal History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS