Geopolitically Driven Resource Stranding and Carbon Emissions from Global Oil and Gas Supply

Abstract Geopolitical conflicts are increasingly reshaping global oil and gas supply chains, yet their implications for resource utilization, stranded resources, and upstream greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions remain poorly quantified. Here, we develop a global field-level dataset covering 16,000+ oil and gas projects and integrate it with MESSAGEix-GOAT, a long-term production and trade model, to trace risk-driven redistribution of extraction, trade, and emissions through 2050. We find that heightened geopolitical risk diverts one-seventh of interregional oil and gas trade away from vulnerable routes linked to the Middle East and Eurasia toward Africa and the Americas, with domestic supply increasing in major importers. This reallocation strands about 7.2 gigatonnes (Gt) of oil and 3.3 trillion cubic meters of natural gas at the field level while unlocking higher-cost and more carbon-intensive substitutes with greater reliance on offshore resources. Cumulative upstream emissions increase by 1.8 Gt CO2-equiv (ranging from 0.8 to 3.2) by midcentury, while enhanced energy security measures can reduce emissions below the low-risk baseline. Our study underscores the need to incorporate geopolitical factors and induced resource stranding and emissions into both energy system assessment and global warming analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c02396
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Geopolitically Driven Resource Stranding and Carbon Emissions from Global Oil and Gas Supply

Xi Lu, Boshu Li, Wenji Zhou, Lin Zhang et al.
Environmental Science & Technology
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

Geopolitically Driven Resource Stranding and Carbon Emissions from Global Oil and Gas Supply

Xi Lu, Boshu Li, Wenji Zhou, Lin Zhang, Feng Song, Zanfeng Wang, Hongtao Ren, Haiping Sun
article en

Abstract

Abstract Geopolitical conflicts are increasingly reshaping global oil and gas supply chains, yet their implications for resource utilization, stranded resources, and upstream greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions remain poorly quantified. Here, we develop a global field-level dataset covering 16,000+ oil and gas projects and integrate it with MESSAGEix-GOAT, a long-term production and trade model, to trace risk-driven redistribution of extraction, trade, and emissions through 2050. We find that heightened geopolitical risk diverts one-seventh of interregional oil and gas trade away from vulnerable routes linked to the Middle East and Eurasia toward Africa and the Americas, with domestic supply increasing in major importers. This reallocation strands about 7.2 gigatonnes (Gt) of oil and 3.3 trillion cubic meters of natural gas at the field level while unlocking higher-cost and more carbon-intensive substitutes with greater reliance on offshore resources. Cumulative upstream emissions increase by 1.8 Gt CO2-equiv (ranging from 0.8 to 3.2) by midcentury, while enhanced energy security measures can reduce emissions below the low-risk baseline. Our study underscores the need to incorporate geopolitical factors and induced resource stranding and emissions into both energy system assessment and global warming analysis.

Environmental Science & Technology
East China University of Science and Technology (CN), China National Offshore Oil Corporation (China) (CN), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Energy International (United States) (US), Renmin University of China (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.