A Comparison of Screening Methods for Assessing Legacy Wells Within CO 2 Storage Licences: Application to Offshore Norway

ABSTRACT Legacy wells represent a critical consideration for offshore CO 2 storage projects, as they may provide potential pathways for fluid or gas migration if poorly constructed, undocumented or inadequately abandoned. Systematically assessing large numbers of legacy wells remains challenging due to heterogeneous data availability and the diversity of existing evaluation approaches. This study presents an open‐source, QGIS‐based framework that integrates well construction data, geological context and multiple established screening methodologies to enable transparent and reproducible legacy‐well screening at the licence scale. The framework is applied to two offshore CO 2 storage licence areas on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, covering legacy wells drilled across several decades and reflecting a range of construction and abandonment practices. The results show that different screening methods produce systematically different classifications when applied to the same wells, highlighting the method‐dependent nature of legacy‐well screening. Screening outcomes vary substantially within and between licence areas and cannot be explained by individual well attributes such as drilling year or well depth alone, underscoring the need for multi‐criteria screening approaches rather than reliance on single proxies. A small subset of wells with previously reported seabed gas occurrences was analysed for contextual comparison. These wells display heterogeneous screening outcomes, and the limited availability of quantified methane flux data precludes any general inference regarding relationships between screening results and leakage behaviour. The presented framework does not replace detailed well integrity analysis or risk assessment. Instead, it provides a practical, transparent and spatially enabled approach for early‐stage screening and prioritisation of legacy wells at the licence level, supporting site evaluation and regulatory review in offshore CO 2 storage projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.70045
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Comparison of Screening Methods for Assessing Legacy Wells Within CO 2 Storage Licences: Application to Offshore Norway

B. Emmel, Bastien Dupuy, Guilhem Hauguel, Ole‐Andre Roli et al.
Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

A Comparison of Screening Methods for Assessing Legacy Wells Within CO 2 Storage Licences: Application to Offshore Norway

B. Emmel, Bastien Dupuy, Guilhem Hauguel, Ole‐Andre Roli, Maxence Vergne
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Legacy wells represent a critical consideration for offshore CO 2 storage projects, as they may provide potential pathways for fluid or gas migration if poorly constructed, undocumented or inadequately abandoned. Systematically assessing large numbers of legacy wells remains challenging due to heterogeneous data availability and the diversity of existing evaluation approaches. This study presents an open‐source, QGIS‐based framework that integrates well construction data, geological context and multiple established screening methodologies to enable transparent and reproducible legacy‐well screening at the licence scale. The framework is applied to two offshore CO 2 storage licence areas on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, covering legacy wells drilled across several decades and reflecting a range of construction and abandonment practices. The results show that different screening methods produce systematically different classifications when applied to the same wells, highlighting the method‐dependent nature of legacy‐well screening. Screening outcomes vary substantially within and between licence areas and cannot be explained by individual well attributes such as drilling year or well depth alone, underscoring the need for multi‐criteria screening approaches rather than reliance on single proxies. A small subset of wells with previously reported seabed gas occurrences was analysed for contextual comparison. These wells display heterogeneous screening outcomes, and the limited availability of quantified methane flux data precludes any general inference regarding relationships between screening results and leakage behaviour. The presented framework does not replace detailed well integrity analysis or risk assessment. Instead, it provides a practical, transparent and spatially enabled approach for early‐stage screening and prioritisation of legacy wells at the licence level, supporting site evaluation and regulatory review in offshore CO 2 storage projects.

Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
SINTEF (NO), UniLaSalle (FR)
European Commission
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.