Comparative Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND: Evidence comparing intermediate-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with concomitant heart failure and chronic kidney disease remains limited. METHODS: Using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, we conducted a retrospective study of adults with heart failure and chronic kidney disease undergoing TAVI or SAVR between January 2020 and December 2025. We excluded patients with redo procedures, history of endocarditis, prior heart transplant, ventricular assist device placement, or concomitant valve surgery. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute kidney injury, and all-cause hospitalization. Outcomes were assessed over 2 years of follow-up using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Before matching, 9575 patients underwent TAVI and 1233 underwent SAVR. Propensity score matching across 21 covariates balanced demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory values, yielding 1034 matched patients in each cohort. During follow-up, TAVI was associated with a higher mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56 [95% CI, 1.21-2.01]) and lower risk of acute kidney injury (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60-0.80]) compared with SAVR. Risks of acute myocardial infarction (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.87-1.44]), ischemic stroke (HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.85-1.45]), and all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-1.00]) were similar. Sensitivity analyses across alternative modeling strategies yielded directionally consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary-era cohort of patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease, SAVR was associated with a lower mortality rate, whereas TAVI was associated with less acute kidney injury. These findings suggest important trade-offs between procedural strategies in high-risk cardiorenal populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.126.051598
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease

Hani Jneid, Ibrahim Mortada, Michael Boyars, Thomas H. Blackwell et al.
Journal of the American Heart Association
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Comparative Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease

Hani Jneid, Ibrahim Mortada, Michael Boyars, Thomas H. Blackwell, Avinav Sanjel, Mostafa Shalaby, Jayasurya Dileep, Aaron Lee, Shareef Mansour, Khaled Chatila
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence comparing intermediate-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with concomitant heart failure and chronic kidney disease remains limited. METHODS: Using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, we conducted a retrospective study of adults with heart failure and chronic kidney disease undergoing TAVI or SAVR between January 2020 and December 2025. We excluded patients with redo procedures, history of endocarditis, prior heart transplant, ventricular assist device placement, or concomitant valve surgery. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute kidney injury, and all-cause hospitalization. Outcomes were assessed over 2 years of follow-up using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Before matching, 9575 patients underwent TAVI and 1233 underwent SAVR. Propensity score matching across 21 covariates balanced demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory values, yielding 1034 matched patients in each cohort. During follow-up, TAVI was associated with a higher mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56 [95% CI, 1.21-2.01]) and lower risk of acute kidney injury (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60-0.80]) compared with SAVR. Risks of acute myocardial infarction (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.87-1.44]), ischemic stroke (HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.85-1.45]), and all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-1.00]) were similar. Sensitivity analyses across alternative modeling strategies yielded directionally consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary-era cohort of patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease, SAVR was associated with a lower mortality rate, whereas TAVI was associated with less acute kidney injury. These findings suggest important trade-offs between procedural strategies in high-risk cardiorenal populations.

Journal of the American Heart Association
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.