Integrating carbon capture in pulp mills towards negative CO2 emissions: a review and case study on technologies and capture potential

Carbon capture is a key technological option for mitigating climate change, particularly in hard-to-abate sectors. As fossil-based CO 2 sources are expected to decline in future energy systems, large biogenic emission sources are gaining increasing importance. Kraft pulp mills represent some of the largest point sources of biogenic CO 2 , offering the potential for large-scale carbon capture without additional biomass input. This study provides a comprehensive review of CO 2 capture technologies applicable to pulp mills, combined with a meta-analysis of literature data and a comparative techno-economic case study based on representative Nordic (integrated) and South American (standalone) pulp mill configurations. Capture options from the major emission sources – recovery boiler, multi-fuel boiler and lime kiln – are evaluated alongside emerging concepts such as black liquor gasification and alternative capture technologies. Capture potential is assessed using a harmonized metric expressed as tonnes of captured CO 2 per air-dry tonne of pulp produced (t CO 2 /ADt), enabling comparison across technologies and process configurations. The results show that the recovery boiler represents the largest single capture source, with a capture potential of 1.5–2.2 t CO 2 /ADt, followed by black liquor gasification (∼1.45 t CO₂/ADt). Capture costs reported in the literature vary widely (8–263 €/t CO 2 ), with most values below 150 €/t CO 2 . The case study highlights that capture costs are highly site-specific, driven primarily by electricity price and mill-level energy integration. Successful implementation will depend on site-specific energy balances, integration strategies, and the availability of viable carbon capture and storage (CCS) or carbon capture and utilization (CCU) value chains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of greenhouse gas control
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2026.104790
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Integrating carbon capture in pulp mills towards negative CO2 emissions: a review and case study on technologies and capture potential

Daniel Klüh, Eemeli Anetjärvi, Satu Lipiäinen, Katja Kuparinen et al.
International journal of greenhouse gas control
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Integrating carbon capture in pulp mills towards negative CO2 emissions: a review and case study on technologies and capture potential

Daniel Klüh, Eemeli Anetjärvi, Satu Lipiäinen, Katja Kuparinen, Orlando Salcedo-Puerto, Esa Vakkilainen, Kristian Melin, Ekaterina Sermyagina, Mario Mero Plaza
article en

Abstract

Carbon capture is a key technological option for mitigating climate change, particularly in hard-to-abate sectors. As fossil-based CO 2 sources are expected to decline in future energy systems, large biogenic emission sources are gaining increasing importance. Kraft pulp mills represent some of the largest point sources of biogenic CO 2 , offering the potential for large-scale carbon capture without additional biomass input. This study provides a comprehensive review of CO 2 capture technologies applicable to pulp mills, combined with a meta-analysis of literature data and a comparative techno-economic case study based on representative Nordic (integrated) and South American (standalone) pulp mill configurations. Capture options from the major emission sources – recovery boiler, multi-fuel boiler and lime kiln – are evaluated alongside emerging concepts such as black liquor gasification and alternative capture technologies. Capture potential is assessed using a harmonized metric expressed as tonnes of captured CO 2 per air-dry tonne of pulp produced (t CO 2 /ADt), enabling comparison across technologies and process configurations. The results show that the recovery boiler represents the largest single capture source, with a capture potential of 1.5–2.2 t CO 2 /ADt, followed by black liquor gasification (∼1.45 t CO₂/ADt). Capture costs reported in the literature vary widely (8–263 €/t CO 2 ), with most values below 150 €/t CO 2 . The case study highlights that capture costs are highly site-specific, driven primarily by electricity price and mill-level energy integration. Successful implementation will depend on site-specific energy balances, integration strategies, and the availability of viable carbon capture and storage (CCS) or carbon capture and utilization (CCU) value chains.

International journal of greenhouse gas controlVol. 156
Maschinenfabrik Reinhausen (Germany) (DE), Valmet Automotive (Finland) (FI), Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.