Natural Amphibole and Biotite Crystals as Potential Reference Materials for In Situ Fe Isotope Measurement

The in situ measurement of stable isotope ratios (e.g., δ 56 Fe) in natural and experimental samples has become an indispensable tool for investigating processes such as diffusion, equilibrium isotope exchange, and crystal growth/dissolution across inter‐ and intra‐mineral domains as well as between minerals, melts and fluids. A key prerequisite for achieving accurate and precise data of such isotope ratios is the availability of well‐characterised solid reference materials (RMs) for use as bracketing standards (calibrators) during in situ measurement. In this study, we evaluate a suite of millimetre‐sized natural amphibole and biotite crystals using both solution nebulisation MC‐ICP‐MS and femtosecond LA‐MC‐ICP‐MS to assess their suitability as RMs for in situ δ 56 Fe measurement. These mineral separates, previously used to establish Fe 2+ /ΣFe measurement by electron probe microanalysis via the flank method, include amphiboles with FeO T mass fractions ranging from 4.2 to 12.7 g/100g and biotites with FeO T mass fractions ranging from 8.2 to 28.6 g/100g. Results from LA‐MC‐ICP‐MS in situ δ 56 Fe measurement indicate that the biotite and amphibole crystals are sufficiently homogeneous (except for Amp‐12 and Amp‐15), with intermediate precision better than 0.10‰ for δ 56 Fe values. Furthermore, the in situ data agree well with solution‐derived Fe isotope ratios within analytical uncertainty (except for Bt‐18 and Bt‐41). Specifically, sample Amp‐15 exhibits significant intra‐crystal heterogeneity, Amp‐12 shows considerable variability in δ 56 Fe values between different crystals, Bt‐18 shows an obvious discrepancy between solution and in situ data and Bt‐41 displays considerable inter‐laboratory inconsistency of solution data. Therefore, the homogeneous mineral separates of biotite (Bt‐25 and Bt‐26) and amphibole (Amp‐11 and Amp‐40) are recommended as matrix‐matched in‐house RMs for isotope ratio calibration and data quality control of spatially resolved Fe isotope measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.70062
Primary Topic
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Natural Amphibole and Biotite Crystals as Potential Reference Materials for In Situ Fe Isotope Measurement

Chunlei Zong, Chao Zhang, Stefan Weyer, Martin Oeser et al.
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
article

Natural Amphibole and Biotite Crystals as Potential Reference Materials for In Situ Fe Isotope Measurement

Chunlei Zong, Chao Zhang, Stefan Weyer, Martin Oeser, Wenning Lu, Kaiyun Chen, Shan Ke, Tai Wen, Haoyang Yuan, Kai Wu, Xiaoyan Li, Zhiyu Zhou, Mingxing Ling
article en

Abstract

The in situ measurement of stable isotope ratios (e.g., δ 56 Fe) in natural and experimental samples has become an indispensable tool for investigating processes such as diffusion, equilibrium isotope exchange, and crystal growth/dissolution across inter‐ and intra‐mineral domains as well as between minerals, melts and fluids. A key prerequisite for achieving accurate and precise data of such isotope ratios is the availability of well‐characterised solid reference materials (RMs) for use as bracketing standards (calibrators) during in situ measurement. In this study, we evaluate a suite of millimetre‐sized natural amphibole and biotite crystals using both solution nebulisation MC‐ICP‐MS and femtosecond LA‐MC‐ICP‐MS to assess their suitability as RMs for in situ δ 56 Fe measurement. These mineral separates, previously used to establish Fe 2+ /ΣFe measurement by electron probe microanalysis via the flank method, include amphiboles with FeO T mass fractions ranging from 4.2 to 12.7 g/100g and biotites with FeO T mass fractions ranging from 8.2 to 28.6 g/100g. Results from LA‐MC‐ICP‐MS in situ δ 56 Fe measurement indicate that the biotite and amphibole crystals are sufficiently homogeneous (except for Amp‐12 and Amp‐15), with intermediate precision better than 0.10‰ for δ 56 Fe values. Furthermore, the in situ data agree well with solution‐derived Fe isotope ratios within analytical uncertainty (except for Bt‐18 and Bt‐41). Specifically, sample Amp‐15 exhibits significant intra‐crystal heterogeneity, Amp‐12 shows considerable variability in δ 56 Fe values between different crystals, Bt‐18 shows an obvious discrepancy between solution and in situ data and Bt‐41 displays considerable inter‐laboratory inconsistency of solution data. Therefore, the homogeneous mineral separates of biotite (Bt‐25 and Bt‐26) and amphibole (Amp‐11 and Amp‐40) are recommended as matrix‐matched in‐house RMs for isotope ratio calibration and data quality control of spatially resolved Fe isotope measurements.

Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Northwest University (CN), Continental (United Kingdom) (GB), East China University of Technology (CN)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.