Newer colonoscope models and texture and color enhancement imaging, rather than computer-aided detection, improve adenoma detection rate

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal adenomas are precursors of colorectal cancer, and adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key quality metric inversely associated with the risk of post-colonoscopy cancer. Technological advances, such as new colonoscope models, texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI), and computer-aided detection (CADe) systems, have been proposed to improve ADR. However, their relative contributions to ADR improvement remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the clinical and technological factors most strongly associated with increased ADR in routine colonoscopy practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 28,459 consecutive colonoscopies performed at a single center between 2017 and 2025. Variables included patient demographics, colonoscopy indications, endoscopist performance, colonoscope type, TXI use and CADe use. Pan-colonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine was used routinely. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with adenoma detection. RESULTS: Overall ADR was 49.3%. Univariable analysis showed that age, male sex, symptom evaluation or surveillance, high-performing endoscopists, new colonoscope type, TXI use and CADe use were associated with adenoma detection. Multivariable analysis identified age (odds ratio 1.044), male sex (1.580), symptom evaluation (1.315) and surveillance (1.193), high-performing endoscopists (1.424), new colonoscope type (1.110) and TXI use (1.201) as independent predictors of adenoma detection. CADe use was not independently associated with ADR. A subgroup analysis restricted to procedures performed using the X1 system yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study indicates that colonoscope type, TXI and endoscopist performance are the primary contributors to ADR, whereas the independent effect of CADe remains inconclusive in routine clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2026.2731958
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Newer colonoscope models and texture and color enhancement imaging, rather than computer-aided detection, improve adenoma detection rate

Keisuke Mabuchi, Hirotoshi Ebinuma, Osamu Toyoshima, Keisuke Hata et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Newer colonoscope models and texture and color enhancement imaging, rather than computer-aided detection, improve adenoma detection rate

Keisuke Mabuchi, Hirotoshi Ebinuma, Osamu Toyoshima, Keisuke Hata, Hiroki Asano, Toshihiro Nishizawa, Ryo Nakamura, Takuma Kaneko, Takuma Hiramatsu, Kazuki Honjo
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal adenomas are precursors of colorectal cancer, and adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key quality metric inversely associated with the risk of post-colonoscopy cancer. Technological advances, such as new colonoscope models, texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI), and computer-aided detection (CADe) systems, have been proposed to improve ADR. However, their relative contributions to ADR improvement remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the clinical and technological factors most strongly associated with increased ADR in routine colonoscopy practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 28,459 consecutive colonoscopies performed at a single center between 2017 and 2025. Variables included patient demographics, colonoscopy indications, endoscopist performance, colonoscope type, TXI use and CADe use. Pan-colonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine was used routinely. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with adenoma detection. RESULTS: Overall ADR was 49.3%. Univariable analysis showed that age, male sex, symptom evaluation or surveillance, high-performing endoscopists, new colonoscope type, TXI use and CADe use were associated with adenoma detection. Multivariable analysis identified age (odds ratio 1.044), male sex (1.580), symptom evaluation (1.315) and surveillance (1.193), high-performing endoscopists (1.424), new colonoscope type (1.110) and TXI use (1.201) as independent predictors of adenoma detection. CADe use was not independently associated with ADR. A subgroup analysis restricted to procedures performed using the X1 system yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study indicates that colonoscope type, TXI and endoscopist performance are the primary contributors to ADR, whereas the independent effect of CADe remains inconclusive in routine clinical practice.

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
National Sanatorium Ooshima Seishōen (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP), International University of Health and Welfare (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.