Mapping the global knowledge base on teacher retention: a mixed-methods integrative review of trends, theories, and policy pathways
Teacher retention has shifted from an individual motivation issue to a global sustainability challenge rooted in organizational and policy systems. Yet scholarship remains fragmented across single-country cases, isolated psychological variables, and method silos. This mixed-methods integrative review maps the field by analyzing 537 studies (1990–2025) through bibliometric science-mapping and thematic synthesis. We find a maturing but still disjointed knowledge base organized around multilevel determinants: micro (self-efficacy, stress, burnout), meso (leadership, organizational climate, job design), and macro (education policy, governance, social inequalities). We contribute an integrative model that links these levels, reframing retention as a structure-agency-context phenomenon. Policy and practice should realign teacher-retention strategies from piecemeal interventions to coherent system packages that pair individual resource-building with supportive organizational architectures and predictable, equity-oriented governance. We outline an agenda emphasizing comparative and longitudinal designs, intervention trials that test multilevel packages, and indicators that track both teacher well-being and organizational resilience.
Authors
- Hamit Özen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-5967)
- Eman Abo‐Zaed Arar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6238-7210)
- Khalid Arar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4094-966X)
- Selahattin Turan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-5819)
- Gülşah Polat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8946-5696)
- Fasih Raza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4935-6132)
Institutions
- Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
- Eskişehir Osmangazi University (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Educational Review
- Published
- 2026-09-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2026.2727067
- Primary Topic
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00