Benchmarking control strategies for wave energy converters: From idealised knowledge to realistic operation

Maximising energy extraction in wave energy converters remains challenging due to the non-causal nature of the optimal control, complex interactions and real-time constraints. This paper presents a benchmarking of four strategies: LiTe-Con, LiTe-Con+, model predictive control (MPC) and spectral control. The evaluation transitions from idealised scenarios with perfect knowledge of the wave excitation force to realistic conditions accounting for estimation and forecasting. The study is conducted using a 1:20 scale pitching WEC model subjected to representative wave climates in the Gulf of Biscay. Results quantify performance degradation induced by imperfect information, highlighting trade-offs between absorbed energy, robustness, and computational complexity. While optimisation-based controllers (MPC and spectral) provide systematic constraint handling and high performance under ideal conditions, they are sensitive to prediction accuracy, with performance reducing 3.27% and 5.1%, respectively, under realistic conditions. In contrast, LiTe-Con+ achieves comparable energy absorption (only 1.57% reduction) with significantly lower computational requirements (being 25 and 930 times faster than spectral and MPC, respectively) and improved robustness, making it a strong candidate for practical controller selection in real WEC deployments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean Engineering
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.128173
Primary Topic
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Benchmarking control strategies for wave energy converters: From idealised knowledge to realistic operation

Demián García-Violini, Markel Peñalba, Xabier Huitzi-Esnaola, Yerai Peña-Sanchez
Ocean Engineering
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
article

Benchmarking control strategies for wave energy converters: From idealised knowledge to realistic operation

Demián García-Violini, Markel Peñalba, Xabier Huitzi-Esnaola, Yerai Peña-Sanchez
article en

Abstract

Maximising energy extraction in wave energy converters remains challenging due to the non-causal nature of the optimal control, complex interactions and real-time constraints. This paper presents a benchmarking of four strategies: LiTe-Con, LiTe-Con+, model predictive control (MPC) and spectral control. The evaluation transitions from idealised scenarios with perfect knowledge of the wave excitation force to realistic conditions accounting for estimation and forecasting. The study is conducted using a 1:20 scale pitching WEC model subjected to representative wave climates in the Gulf of Biscay. Results quantify performance degradation induced by imperfect information, highlighting trade-offs between absorbed energy, robustness, and computational complexity. While optimisation-based controllers (MPC and spectral) provide systematic constraint handling and high performance under ideal conditions, they are sensitive to prediction accuracy, with performance reducing 3.27% and 5.1%, respectively, under realistic conditions. In contrast, LiTe-Con+ achieves comparable energy absorption (only 1.57% reduction) with significantly lower computational requirements (being 25 and 930 times faster than spectral and MPC, respectively) and improved robustness, making it a strong candidate for practical controller selection in real WEC deployments.

Ocean EngineeringVol. 367
Ikerbasque (ES), National University of Quilmes (AR), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), Mondragon Unibertsitatea (ES), Centro Científico Tecnológico - San Juan (AR)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Eusko Jaurlaritza, European Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.