The ‘In-Between Space’ of Peer Research: Sharing the Lessons Learned From a Study With Young People

The use of a participatory approach to research concerned with children and young people, where they act as peer researchers working as part of a research team, has been both promoted and critiqued in the literature. Drawing on the challenges and solutions identified by Bradbury-Jones and Taylor (2015) in participatory research with children, and the notion of a “space in between” (Dwyer and Buckle, 2009) regarding academic and community expertise, this paper shares reflections from a research team featuring academic and peer researchers and their host community organisation who together undertook two studies over a period of three years. This paper offers a practice-based framework for how peer research can be supported under real-world constraints. We note the importance of trauma-informed practice in research, beyond safeguarding protocols, and the need for flexible participation models, such as Franks’ “Pockets of Participation” (2011), which can support engagement without overburdening peer researchers. We find that a relational infrastructure is a structural necessity to meaningful collaboration and the need to reframe what counts as expertise. The contributions of peer researchers helped shift the research from a more extractive to a more relational and contextually grounded process in which real-world change becomes more possible. We share key learnings and recommendations for research practice, commissioning and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Participatory Research Methods
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.167271
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The ‘In-Between Space’ of Peer Research: Sharing the Lessons Learned From a Study With Young People

Melanie Jordan, Lorraine Khan, Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, Eddie Kane et al.
Journal of Participatory Research Methods
Participatory Visual Research Methods
article

The ‘In-Between Space’ of Peer Research: Sharing the Lessons Learned From a Study With Young People

Melanie Jordan, Lorraine Khan, Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, Eddie Kane, Caroline Bradbury‐Jones, Emily Evans, Pascal Pelosi Campbell, Justin Finlayson
article en

Abstract

The use of a participatory approach to research concerned with children and young people, where they act as peer researchers working as part of a research team, has been both promoted and critiqued in the literature. Drawing on the challenges and solutions identified by Bradbury-Jones and Taylor (2015) in participatory research with children, and the notion of a “space in between” (Dwyer and Buckle, 2009) regarding academic and community expertise, this paper shares reflections from a research team featuring academic and peer researchers and their host community organisation who together undertook two studies over a period of three years. This paper offers a practice-based framework for how peer research can be supported under real-world constraints. We note the importance of trauma-informed practice in research, beyond safeguarding protocols, and the need for flexible participation models, such as Franks’ “Pockets of Participation” (2011), which can support engagement without overburdening peer researchers. We find that a relational infrastructure is a structural necessity to meaningful collaboration and the need to reframe what counts as expertise. The contributions of peer researchers helped shift the research from a more extractive to a more relational and contextually grounded process in which real-world change becomes more possible. We share key learnings and recommendations for research practice, commissioning and practice.

Journal of Participatory Research MethodsVol. 7(5)
University of Nottingham (GB), Clinical Research Solutions (US), Borders College (GB), University College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.