CGA-DTA: interaction-conditioned graph topology and cross-graph attention for drug--target affinity prediction

Drug–target affinity (DTA) prediction supports virtual screening in computer-aided drug discovery, but graph-based models still face two linked limitations. Adaptive-topology methods usually learn drug and protein graphs independently and merge them only at the prediction head, whereas cross-attention methods model drug–protein interactions after fixed or separately learned topology. Thus, topology refinement is rarely conditioned on the specific binding partner. In addition, many graph-based pipelines rely on multiple-sequence-alignment (MSA)-derived protein features, which limits scalability for large or newly annotated target sets. We propose CGA-DTA , a dual-graph framework built around interaction-conditioned topology . Adaptive Multi-head Graph Learning (AMGL) first learns multiple soft adjacency heads for each graph; an Interaction-Conditioned Topology (ICT) gate then uses a global summary of the binding partner to re-weight the head mixture. ICT therefore changes the effective row-stochastic message-passing kernel, rather than predicting physical contacts or reconstructing topology at the node or edge level. A Cross-Graph Attention Module (CGAM) subsequently applies bidirectional node-level attention to the conditioned representations. CGA-DTA uses ESM-2 residue embeddings as alignment-free protein node features, while the initial PconsC4 contact-map topology remains MSA-dependent. Across Davis, KIBA, Metz, and ToxCast, CGA-DTA obtains MSE/CI values of 0.168/0.915, 0.116/0.910, 0.231/0.854, and 0.149/0.920, respectively. Component ablations consistently assign the largest individual gain to CGAM and a smaller additional gain to ICT. CGA-DTA shows that coupling adaptive graph learning with cross-graph attention is effective for DTA prediction. The evidence supports partner-conditioned re-weighting of learned message-passing kernels, but does not establish that these kernels are physical protein–ligand contact maps. Replacing the remaining MSA-based contact-map stage and validating the learned kernels against experimentally resolved complexes are important next steps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-026-06647-1
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

CGA-DTA: interaction-conditioned graph topology and cross-graph attention for drug--target affinity prediction

Wenwen Yu, Haiou Qi, Ting Yu, Shiyu Liu et al.
BMC Bioinformatics
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

CGA-DTA: interaction-conditioned graph topology and cross-graph attention for drug--target affinity prediction

Wenwen Yu, Haiou Qi, Ting Yu, Shiyu Liu, Hao Zang, Ye Liu
article en

Abstract

Drug–target affinity (DTA) prediction supports virtual screening in computer-aided drug discovery, but graph-based models still face two linked limitations. Adaptive-topology methods usually learn drug and protein graphs independently and merge them only at the prediction head, whereas cross-attention methods model drug–protein interactions after fixed or separately learned topology. Thus, topology refinement is rarely conditioned on the specific binding partner. In addition, many graph-based pipelines rely on multiple-sequence-alignment (MSA)-derived protein features, which limits scalability for large or newly annotated target sets. We propose CGA-DTA , a dual-graph framework built around interaction-conditioned topology . Adaptive Multi-head Graph Learning (AMGL) first learns multiple soft adjacency heads for each graph; an Interaction-Conditioned Topology (ICT) gate then uses a global summary of the binding partner to re-weight the head mixture. ICT therefore changes the effective row-stochastic message-passing kernel, rather than predicting physical contacts or reconstructing topology at the node or edge level. A Cross-Graph Attention Module (CGAM) subsequently applies bidirectional node-level attention to the conditioned representations. CGA-DTA uses ESM-2 residue embeddings as alignment-free protein node features, while the initial PconsC4 contact-map topology remains MSA-dependent. Across Davis, KIBA, Metz, and ToxCast, CGA-DTA obtains MSE/CI values of 0.168/0.915, 0.116/0.910, 0.231/0.854, and 0.149/0.920, respectively. Component ablations consistently assign the largest individual gain to CGAM and a smaller additional gain to ICT. CGA-DTA shows that coupling adaptive graph learning with cross-graph attention is effective for DTA prediction. The evidence supports partner-conditioned re-weighting of learned message-passing kernels, but does not establish that these kernels are physical protein–ligand contact maps. Replacing the remaining MSA-based contact-map stage and validating the learned kernels against experimentally resolved complexes are important next steps.

BMC Bioinformatics
East China University of Science and Technology (CN), Fudan University (CN), Renji Hospital (CN), Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN), Suizhou Central Hospital (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.