THE TABLE OF EUDEMIAN ETHICS II 3 (1220B38–1221A12) IN CONTEXT

Abstract In his new edition of the Greek text of Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics , Rowe has excised the third column of the table of EE II 3. In this essay, I argue that a careful understanding of the argumentative approach Aristotle adopts in these sections provides strong grounds for rejecting Rowe’s editorial bracketing of the third column. My argument is divided into four parts. First, I contend that in EE II 3 Aristotle intends to expound the domains of the several character virtues by articulating their underlying πάθη. Next, I show that Aristotle employs the notion of paronymy to conduct the enquiry into character virtue at the level of the abstract quality and of the concrete individual who exhibits the relevant πάθος. I then turn to considering the specific difficulties involved in making sense of two lines of the table, namely the δίκαιον and the φρόνησις trio. On the whole, I hope to show not only that the transmitted text should be retained as is, but also that understanding why this is so will enhance significantly our understanding of Aristotle’s project in these sections of the EE .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Classical Quarterly
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838826101578
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

THE TABLE OF EUDEMIAN ETHICS II 3 (1220B38–1221A12) IN CONTEXT

Giulio Di Basilio
The Classical Quarterly
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

THE TABLE OF EUDEMIAN ETHICS II 3 (1220B38–1221A12) IN CONTEXT

Giulio Di Basilio
article en

Abstract

Abstract In his new edition of the Greek text of Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics , Rowe has excised the third column of the table of EE II 3. In this essay, I argue that a careful understanding of the argumentative approach Aristotle adopts in these sections provides strong grounds for rejecting Rowe’s editorial bracketing of the third column. My argument is divided into four parts. First, I contend that in EE II 3 Aristotle intends to expound the domains of the several character virtues by articulating their underlying πάθη. Next, I show that Aristotle employs the notion of paronymy to conduct the enquiry into character virtue at the level of the abstract quality and of the concrete individual who exhibits the relevant πάθος. I then turn to considering the specific difficulties involved in making sense of two lines of the table, namely the δίκαιον and the φρόνησις trio. On the whole, I hope to show not only that the transmitted text should be retained as is, but also that understanding why this is so will enhance significantly our understanding of Aristotle’s project in these sections of the EE .

The Classical Quarterly
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE TABLE OF EUDEMIAN ETHICS II 3 (1220B38–1221A12) IN CONTEXT — Giulio Di Basilio · The Classical Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS