Decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks through a polymer engineering lens: tissue-source-dependent macromolecular architecture, crosslinking chemistry, rheological behavior, and 3D bioprinting performance

Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) bioinks are widely regarded as one of the more compositionally faithful hydrogel platforms for three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting in tissue engineering. However, the field still lacks a unified polymer engineering framework that links tissue-specific macromolecular architecture to rheological behavior and printing performance. This review synthesizes recent experimental studies on dECM bioinks derived from six tissue sources: cardiac, cartilage, liver, adipose, dermal, and neural tissues. These systems are analyzed through polymer network design, focusing on matrix composition, crosslinking chemistry, rheological properties, and printability. Tissue origin defines the polymeric composition of dECM and therefore influences the crosslinking strategies required to produce printable constructs with relevant mechanical properties. Across several composite systems, dECM incorporation creates a rheological paradox: storage modulus and viscosity may decrease compared with single-component matrices, likely because bioactive ECM macromolecules interfere with pre-formed polymer networks. Methacrylation partially resolves this limitation by separating mechanical tunability from native compositional constraints, enabling concentration-dependent stiffness modulation across approximately two orders of magnitude. Decellularization methodology also emerges as a critical, yet often underestimated, determinant of bioink performance. A polymer engineering perspective provides a more mechanistically useful basis for dECM bioink design than biological fidelity alone. Matching tissue-specific matrix composition, crosslinking architecture, rheological behavior, and printing parameters is essential for advancing dECM-based constructs toward clinical translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2026.2734517
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks through a polymer engineering lens: tissue-source-dependent macromolecular architecture, crosslinking chemistry, rheological behavior, and 3D bioprinting performance

Mohammad Ebrahim Astaneh, Shahbaz Juneja, Yasir Q. Аlmajidi, Rucha N. Acharya et al.
Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks through a polymer engineering lens: tissue-source-dependent macromolecular architecture, crosslinking chemistry, rheological behavior, and 3D bioprinting performance

Mohammad Ebrahim Astaneh, Shahbaz Juneja, Yasir Q. Аlmajidi, Rucha N. Acharya, Mirza R. Baig, Ozodbek Nematov, Narges Fereydouni, Ho Soonmin, Ibrokhim Sapaev, Rahul Saxena
article en

Abstract

Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) bioinks are widely regarded as one of the more compositionally faithful hydrogel platforms for three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting in tissue engineering. However, the field still lacks a unified polymer engineering framework that links tissue-specific macromolecular architecture to rheological behavior and printing performance. This review synthesizes recent experimental studies on dECM bioinks derived from six tissue sources: cardiac, cartilage, liver, adipose, dermal, and neural tissues. These systems are analyzed through polymer network design, focusing on matrix composition, crosslinking chemistry, rheological properties, and printability. Tissue origin defines the polymeric composition of dECM and therefore influences the crosslinking strategies required to produce printable constructs with relevant mechanical properties. Across several composite systems, dECM incorporation creates a rheological paradox: storage modulus and viscosity may decrease compared with single-component matrices, likely because bioactive ECM macromolecules interfere with pre-formed polymer networks. Methacrylation partially resolves this limitation by separating mechanical tunability from native compositional constraints, enabling concentration-dependent stiffness modulation across approximately two orders of magnitude. Decellularization methodology also emerges as a critical, yet often underestimated, determinant of bioink performance. A polymer engineering perspective provides a more mechanistically useful basis for dECM bioink design than biological fidelity alone. Matching tissue-specific matrix composition, crosslinking architecture, rheological behavior, and printing parameters is essential for advancing dECM-based constructs toward clinical translation.

Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition
Chandigarh University (IN), University of Central Asia (KG), INTI International University (MY), Western Caspian University (AZ), Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers (UZ), Allied Healthcare Products (United States) (US), Jizzakh State Pedagogical University (UZ), Caspian University (KZ), Fasa University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ), Nahrain University (IQ), Sharda University (IN), Dubai Pharmacy College (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.