Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Reversible Gastric Bypass Stent System for Weight Loss: A Multicentre Real‐World Study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the Gastric Bypass Stent System (GBSS), a novel reversible duodenal-jejunal bypass liner, in a large-scale real-world setting. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre real-world study included 1536 patients with overweight or obesity who underwent GBSS implantation across 239 hospitals in China. Participants were followed up monthly. The present analysis used registry data available up to a cutoff date of October 31, 2025. Primary efficacy endpoints included percentage total body weight loss (%TBWL), percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) and weight loss responder rates (proportion achieving > 5% and > 10% loss). Secondary endpoints focused on safety and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: were included. Rapid weight loss was achieved by 3 months post-implantation, with mean %TBWL of 11.5% (SD 5.5) and mean %EWL of 50.1% (SD 30.4). Notably, 90.2% and 60.7% of participants achieved > 5% and > 10% weight loss, respectively. Weight loss remained relatively stable during 4-12 months after implantation, as supported by a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Regarding safety, stent displacement occurred in 4.6% of cases. Gastrointestinal bleeding was reported in 4.3% of participants, including haematemesis in 2.8% and melaena in 1.5%. The median implantation duration was 3 months, with intolerance being the most frequently reported reason for device retrieval. All reported AEs were managed conservatively or endoscopically, with no deaths or surgical interventions reported. CONCLUSIONS: The GBSS was associated with clinically meaningful weight loss as a minimally invasive intervention. Its safety profile is generally controllable; although stent displacement and intolerance occur, they are manageable. The GBSS may represent a promising reversible therapeutic option bridging the gap between conservative management and bariatric surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71330
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Reversible Gastric Bypass Stent System for Weight Loss: A Multicentre Real‐World Study

Yanhua Zhou, Shutian Zhang, Yongqiu Wei, Chuan‐Guo Guo et al.
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Reversible Gastric Bypass Stent System for Weight Loss: A Multicentre Real‐World Study

Yanhua Zhou, Shutian Zhang, Yongqiu Wei, Chuan‐Guo Guo, Peng Li, Yutao Wang, Can Sun
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the Gastric Bypass Stent System (GBSS), a novel reversible duodenal-jejunal bypass liner, in a large-scale real-world setting. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre real-world study included 1536 patients with overweight or obesity who underwent GBSS implantation across 239 hospitals in China. Participants were followed up monthly. The present analysis used registry data available up to a cutoff date of October 31, 2025. Primary efficacy endpoints included percentage total body weight loss (%TBWL), percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) and weight loss responder rates (proportion achieving > 5% and > 10% loss). Secondary endpoints focused on safety and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: were included. Rapid weight loss was achieved by 3 months post-implantation, with mean %TBWL of 11.5% (SD 5.5) and mean %EWL of 50.1% (SD 30.4). Notably, 90.2% and 60.7% of participants achieved > 5% and > 10% weight loss, respectively. Weight loss remained relatively stable during 4-12 months after implantation, as supported by a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Regarding safety, stent displacement occurred in 4.6% of cases. Gastrointestinal bleeding was reported in 4.3% of participants, including haematemesis in 2.8% and melaena in 1.5%. The median implantation duration was 3 months, with intolerance being the most frequently reported reason for device retrieval. All reported AEs were managed conservatively or endoscopically, with no deaths or surgical interventions reported. CONCLUSIONS: The GBSS was associated with clinically meaningful weight loss as a minimally invasive intervention. Its safety profile is generally controllable; although stent displacement and intolerance occur, they are manageable. The GBSS may represent a promising reversible therapeutic option bridging the gap between conservative management and bariatric surgery.

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Peking University (CN), National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (CN), Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN), Institut de Recherche en Santé Digestive (FR), Beijing Friendship Hospital (CN)
Beijing Nova Program
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.