Climate Policy Progression: A Comparative Analysis of U.S. Cities’ Climate Action Plans Over Time

Climate Action Plans (CAPs) are important tools for translating climate plans into actions. As many U.S. cities are developing their second round of CAPs, it is essential to consider how and why a city's CAP objectives may change over time, given local political contexts. To examine these changes, we selected 11 large U.S. cities that have two rounds of CAPs and analyzed both CAPs through keyword and qualitative analysis, utilizing a multiple within-case study analysis approach. Our findings show an increase in climate equity and justice integration, including diversified community participation during development. Transportation and building infrastructure persist as universal priorities, and most plans are focused on mitigation activities, compared to adaptation and resilience building. Finally, 16 out of 22 CAPs discussed specific monitoring strategies; however, gaps remained in implementation accountability. Our CAP analysis framework can be applied across scales, regions, and longitudinally to assess how CAPs change over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Affairs Review
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874261486752
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Climate Policy Progression: A Comparative Analysis of U.S. Cities’ Climate Action Plans Over Time

Andres Reyna, Kennedy Gould, Amy Quandt, Peaceibisia Jack et al.
Urban Affairs Review
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Climate Policy Progression: A Comparative Analysis of U.S. Cities’ Climate Action Plans Over Time

Andres Reyna, Kennedy Gould, Amy Quandt, Peaceibisia Jack, Nayan Asikunnaby, Maximilliano Ramirez, Fabian Montes-Davis, Elmer Paolo Urbano, Tyana Ortiz, Steven Saldivar, E’lysha D. Guerrero, Victoria Joya Euceda
article en

Abstract

Climate Action Plans (CAPs) are important tools for translating climate plans into actions. As many U.S. cities are developing their second round of CAPs, it is essential to consider how and why a city's CAP objectives may change over time, given local political contexts. To examine these changes, we selected 11 large U.S. cities that have two rounds of CAPs and analyzed both CAPs through keyword and qualitative analysis, utilizing a multiple within-case study analysis approach. Our findings show an increase in climate equity and justice integration, including diversified community participation during development. Transportation and building infrastructure persist as universal priorities, and most plans are focused on mitigation activities, compared to adaptation and resilience building. Finally, 16 out of 22 CAPs discussed specific monitoring strategies; however, gaps remained in implementation accountability. Our CAP analysis framework can be applied across scales, regions, and longitudinally to assess how CAPs change over time.

Urban Affairs Review
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), San Diego State University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Climate Policy Progression: A Comparative Analysis of U.S. Cities’ Climate Action Plans Over Time — Andres Reyna, Kennedy Gould, et al. · Urban Affairs Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS