Pose Reproduction, Cross Docking, Database Enrichment, and Reverse Docking Benchmarks for DOCK6, Vina, and AutoDock 4 with Emphasis on Approved Drugs

Abstract High-quality test sets to evaluate docking software help the community understand strengths and weaknesses of different methods and programs. In this work, we introduce SB2025, a calculation-ready set of 1,244 protein-ligand complexes derived from the PDB, curated using literature-based ligand protonation states, and freely available in DOCK6, AutoDock Vina, and AutoDock 4 (AD4) formats. SB2025 includes 322 unique proteins, 17 major protein classes, and ligands with a wide range of properties and flexibilities, making it a broad and challenging test set. FARMA2025, a specific subset of SB2025, contains 165 approved drugs bound to their pharmacological targets and closely mirrors the distribution of FDA drug target classes for small molecules through 2023 (r2 = 0.72). Comprehensive benchmarking was subsequently performed to evaluate pose reproduction (PR), cross-docking (CD), database enrichment (DE), and reverse docking (RD) under standardized conditions. Averaged PR success rate across triplicate runs for DOCK6 was slightly improved compared to Vina (followed by AD4) using both the large SB2025 test set and the more drug-focused FARMA2025 test set. Conversely, CD matrix success rates for AD4 were more favorable than DOCK6 or Vina across 11 protein families. The programs all yielded substantial early DE; however, the number of active ligands in common between the programs within the top 1% of the database, with one exception, was surprisingly low. Challenging RD tests using FARMA2025, which gauge the ability to correctly rank the cognate structure best, indicate that generating the correct ligand pose is necessary but not sufficient. SB2025, FARMA2025, and example scripts and protocols for benchmarking are available at ringo.ams.stonybrook.edu (downloads) and github.com/rizzolab.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01375
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Pose Reproduction, Cross Docking, Database Enrichment, and Reverse Docking Benchmarks for DOCK6, Vina, and AutoDock 4 with Emphasis on Approved Drugs

Robert C. Rizzo, Carissa P. Corbo, Scott R. Laverty
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Pose Reproduction, Cross Docking, Database Enrichment, and Reverse Docking Benchmarks for DOCK6, Vina, and AutoDock 4 with Emphasis on Approved Drugs

Robert C. Rizzo, Carissa P. Corbo, Scott R. Laverty
article en

Abstract

Abstract High-quality test sets to evaluate docking software help the community understand strengths and weaknesses of different methods and programs. In this work, we introduce SB2025, a calculation-ready set of 1,244 protein-ligand complexes derived from the PDB, curated using literature-based ligand protonation states, and freely available in DOCK6, AutoDock Vina, and AutoDock 4 (AD4) formats. SB2025 includes 322 unique proteins, 17 major protein classes, and ligands with a wide range of properties and flexibilities, making it a broad and challenging test set. FARMA2025, a specific subset of SB2025, contains 165 approved drugs bound to their pharmacological targets and closely mirrors the distribution of FDA drug target classes for small molecules through 2023 (r2 = 0.72). Comprehensive benchmarking was subsequently performed to evaluate pose reproduction (PR), cross-docking (CD), database enrichment (DE), and reverse docking (RD) under standardized conditions. Averaged PR success rate across triplicate runs for DOCK6 was slightly improved compared to Vina (followed by AD4) using both the large SB2025 test set and the more drug-focused FARMA2025 test set. Conversely, CD matrix success rates for AD4 were more favorable than DOCK6 or Vina across 11 protein families. The programs all yielded substantial early DE; however, the number of active ligands in common between the programs within the top 1% of the database, with one exception, was surprisingly low. Challenging RD tests using FARMA2025, which gauge the ability to correctly rank the cognate structure best, indicate that generating the correct ligand pose is necessary but not sufficient. SB2025, FARMA2025, and example scripts and protocols for benchmarking are available at ringo.ams.stonybrook.edu (downloads) and github.com/rizzolab.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Stony Brook University (US)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pose Reproduction, Cross Docking, Database Enrichment, and Reverse Docking Benchmarks for DOCK6, Vina, and AutoDock 4 with Emphasis on Approved Drugs — Robert C. Rizzo, Carissa P. Corbo, et al. · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS