Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systemic Scoping Review

ABSTRACT This paper presents a scoping review of how Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has been conceptualized through systemic perspectives, with particular attention to direct and indirect connections with General Systems Theory (GST). It maps the existing literature, identifies research trends and highlights key issues framing systemic perspectives on AIEd. Peer‐reviewed journal articles published in English between 2008 and 2025 were searched in Scopus and ERIC, supplemented by backward and forward snowballing in Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore and Semantic Scholar. The final search, completed in June 2025, yielded a final sample of 12 studies ( n = 12). Thematic analysis, supported by qualitative coding procedures and specialized software, was applied. Findings indicate that explicit use of GST in AIEd remains limited, whereas systemic perspectives appear mainly through complexity, feedback, adaptation, sociotechnical interaction and educational transformation. This contribution clarifies AI integration as systemic educational change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70164
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systemic Scoping Review

Theodoros Kosmanis, Dimitra Kapousizi
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systemic Scoping Review

Theodoros Kosmanis, Dimitra Kapousizi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents a scoping review of how Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has been conceptualized through systemic perspectives, with particular attention to direct and indirect connections with General Systems Theory (GST). It maps the existing literature, identifies research trends and highlights key issues framing systemic perspectives on AIEd. Peer‐reviewed journal articles published in English between 2008 and 2025 were searched in Scopus and ERIC, supplemented by backward and forward snowballing in Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore and Semantic Scholar. The final search, completed in June 2025, yielded a final sample of 12 studies ( n = 12). Thematic analysis, supported by qualitative coding procedures and specialized software, was applied. Findings indicate that explicit use of GST in AIEd remains limited, whereas systemic perspectives appear mainly through complexity, feedback, adaptation, sociotechnical interaction and educational transformation. This contribution clarifies AI integration as systemic educational change.

Systems Research and Behavioral Science
International Hellenic University (GR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systemic Scoping Review — Theodoros Kosmanis, Dimitra Kapousizi · Systems Research and Behavioral Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS