How ethics operationalization breaks down in practice: expert perspectives from healthcare AI

Abstract Efforts to promote “Trustworthy AI” have focused on operationalizing high-level ethical principles through tools, standards, and governance mechanisms. Yet a persistent gap remains between ethical guidance and day-to-day development practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten experts in AI ethics, healthcare AI, and socio-technical research to examine how ethical principles are operationalized in real-world AI development. Participants described several ways in which efforts to operationalize ethical principles break down in practice. While existing operationalization approaches were viewed as useful, participants discussed conceptual, epistemic, institutional, and socio-technical conditions that constrain their effectiveness. Our findings suggest that the operationalization gap cannot be understood independently of the broader contexts in which AI systems are designed, developed, and governed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01381-z
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

How ethics operationalization breaks down in practice: expert perspectives from healthcare AI

Vince I. Madai, Riana Minocher, Gabriele Pluktaite, Isabel Velarde et al.
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

How ethics operationalization breaks down in practice: expert perspectives from healthcare AI

Vince I. Madai, Riana Minocher, Gabriele Pluktaite, Isabel Velarde, Valerie Buerger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Efforts to promote “Trustworthy AI” have focused on operationalizing high-level ethical principles through tools, standards, and governance mechanisms. Yet a persistent gap remains between ethical guidance and day-to-day development practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten experts in AI ethics, healthcare AI, and socio-technical research to examine how ethical principles are operationalized in real-world AI development. Participants described several ways in which efforts to operationalize ethical principles break down in practice. While existing operationalization approaches were viewed as useful, participants discussed conceptual, epistemic, institutional, and socio-technical conditions that constrain their effectiveness. Our findings suggest that the operationalization gap cannot be understood independently of the broader contexts in which AI systems are designed, developed, and governed.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(5)
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How ethics operationalization breaks down in practice: expert perspectives from healthcare AI — Vince I. Madai, Riana Minocher, et al. · AI and Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS