Evaluation of inert gases as alternatives to Carbon Dioxide for stunning pigs: effects on gas stability, effectiveness and animal welfare

The European Union requires pigs to be stunned before slaughter, with Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) being the most common method, although it is increasingly criticized for its aversiveness. This study evaluated inert gases for stability, effectiveness, and animal welfare. Ten gas mixtures were pre-tested in a plexiglass box, with 100% Argon (Ar), 85% Argon/15% CO₂ (ArCO₂), and 50% Argon/50% Nitrogen (ArN₂) selected for animal trials. A total of 160 piglets (30–50 kg) were stunned and slaughtered, with CO₂ serving as standard method. All gases remained stable under experimental conditions, and weather had no influence. Carbon Dioxide elicited strong aversive reactions. Mild responses occurred with ArCO₂. Loss of posture occurred the fastest in CO₂, and the slowest in Ar. In conclusion, inert gases and their mixtures provided effective stunning with markedly reduced aversive behaviour compared to CO₂, although requiring longer exposure times. Further validation is recommended under commercial slaughter conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2026.2722235
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluation of inert gases as alternatives to Carbon Dioxide for stunning pigs: effects on gas stability, effectiveness and animal welfare

Dagmar Brüggemann, Ulrike Machold, Václav Pohůnek, Sebastian Zimmermann et al.
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Evaluation of inert gases as alternatives to Carbon Dioxide for stunning pigs: effects on gas stability, effectiveness and animal welfare

Dagmar Brüggemann, Ulrike Machold, Václav Pohůnek, Sebastian Zimmermann, Ahmad Hamedy, Lisa Klotz
article en

Abstract

The European Union requires pigs to be stunned before slaughter, with Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) being the most common method, although it is increasingly criticized for its aversiveness. This study evaluated inert gases for stability, effectiveness, and animal welfare. Ten gas mixtures were pre-tested in a plexiglass box, with 100% Argon (Ar), 85% Argon/15% CO₂ (ArCO₂), and 50% Argon/50% Nitrogen (ArN₂) selected for animal trials. A total of 160 piglets (30–50 kg) were stunned and slaughtered, with CO₂ serving as standard method. All gases remained stable under experimental conditions, and weather had no influence. Carbon Dioxide elicited strong aversive reactions. Mild responses occurred with ArCO₂. Loss of posture occurred the fastest in CO₂, and the slowest in Ar. In conclusion, inert gases and their mixtures provided effective stunning with markedly reduced aversive behaviour compared to CO₂, although requiring longer exposure times. Further validation is recommended under commercial slaughter conditions.

Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science
Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences (DE), Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology (RU), University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague (CZ), Leipzig University (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of inert gases as alternatives to Carbon Dioxide for stunning pigs: effects on gas stability, effectiveness and animal welfare — Dagmar Brüggemann, Ulrike Machold, et al. · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS